Go Back   Matt-Hughes.com Official Forums > General Discussions > Politics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-23-2012, 03:38 AM
VCURamFan's Avatar
VCURamFan VCURamFan is online now
MMA, VCU, & Doctor Who
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Basketball Capital of the World
Posts: 14,324
Send a message via AIM to VCURamFan
Default Letter from Lorenzo to Congress



Quote:
Before everyone starts their 'Dude, WTF' threads across MMA message boards, let me give you a brief rundown of what I believe Lorenzo Fertitta was thinking when he wrote this letter to Congressman Lamar Smith in support of the SOPA act that we at MiddleEasy are vehemently against.

Over the last decade, we witnessed online piracy literally dismantle the music industry. With the advent of Napster, college kids choked the bandwidth of their dorms downloading overrated albums from artists like 'Ben Folds Five.' Admit it, we all did. Granted, it's tough to consider it 'stealing' when the items we took weren't even tangible. The music industry knew sales were in a massive decline, so they did what any industry would do if they had a seemingly endless amount of money and K-1 level lawyers -- attack the people that were engaging in peer-to-peer sharing. Little old ladies were being detained by the FBI, kids across America were being arrested after school for 'stealing' -- it was just a giant mess. However, the detainment of citizens across the country only inspired more people to illegally download content and sparked a surge in new P2P technologies. The 'iron fist' approach backfired for the music industry, and they realized their approach must change. Production companies begin working with internet-based companies to deliver their product to the people that would normally just jack it from the internet. Those people were now presented with a method to digitally download music legally (and at a higher quality), and we saw entities like the 'iTune store' become a common staple in Western culture.

In the past, ZUFFA has attacked (and continues to attack) websites established for the sole purpose of broadcasting live UFC events which undeniably undercuts revenue that could have been earned during the show. No one should be surprised by this. UFC operates on primarily a PPV business model with most of their undisclosed income coming from cable/satellite providers at a moderately priced rate. Without revenue accumulated from this model, the UFC would be a local Las Vegas promotion with an extreme obsession with geometrical shapes. A multitude of unnamed websites have been established across the net to give viewers free and illegal access to live UFC events while having the audacity to spam their sites with ads -- essentially making money off a product they stole.

That's screwed up.

Pretend like you don't have an annoying girlfriend and the lock on your car door works. Put yourself in Lorenzo Fertitta's shoes, a guy that literally resurrected a company on life support, burned through an unimaginable amount of money and finally made the company into what you see today. Now imagine a few rogue sites dipping in your pockets and removing potential money that could have been created from a live UFC event. Sure it affects you (remember, you're Lorenzo Fertitta in this example), but what about the entire underlying structure of the UFC? Fighter payouts (and bonuses) are lower. With less money, the overall production of UFC events are marginal at best. People will lose interest in a declining product and the sport we love will lose relevancy in the US. There would be no FOX deals. MMA fans would go through a steady bout of depression and eventually focus their energy in appreciating the fine aspects of rodeo as a sport.

By embracing Xbox 360 (and UFC.com) as a medium to deliver their product, the UFC has accepted that most people prefer to watch live events through digital means. That option is now present for potential consumers, and as we've seen with the music industry, it's a smart move. However, Mr. Lorenzo Fertitta, please stop supporting SOPA/PIPA or any variation of it from now until the sun kills the earth. We understood you're against piracy, and it makes complete sense that you are. But SOPA being the solution to stop piracy is like performing brain surgery with a medieval flail. It puts the fear of Dana White into rogue sites that stream UFC events, but it simultaneously robs the American people of our constitutional rights. SOPA is censorship. It's a freedom suppressor with the ability to completely remove entire domains from being accessed by everyone in the United States -- communist China style.

You know all of those slick YouTube highlight films created by phenomenal editors across the world which are aimed at increasing interest in the UFC product? Under SOPA, any site that posts these highlight videos (including MiddleEasy, The Underground, CagePotato and every other MMA message board you could think of) would be completely removed from the internet. We're not talking about a few pages being deleted from the site. Not at all. SOPA would have the power to censor an entire domain name.

I can only assume what was going through Lorenzo Fertitta's mind when he wrote this letter. He wanted to protect the interest of the UFC, but I'm assuming he wasn't aware of the severe ramifications that SOPA could have instituted on the American people (and the world). Based on that logic, Lorenzo Fertitta should get a pass on this one -- however, I could be completely wrong. Perhaps you should call me up, Lorenzo. Give MiddleEasy an exclusive interview on your stance on SOPA. I'm sure you can get my number from ZUFFA and I'm absolutely certain MMA fans that have supported the UFC for years would love to hear your stance.

Now check out Lorenzo Fertitta's letter that was sent to Lamar Smith, the chief sponsor of SOPA, which expressed the UFC's support of SOPA/PIPA. Oh, and to the readers out there -- you're not Lorenzo Fertitta anymore. That ended a few paragraphs ago. Now stop putting a down payment on the new Bugatti Grand Sport with money you no longer have. Sorry.


__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-23-2012, 03:39 AM
VCURamFan's Avatar
VCURamFan VCURamFan is online now
MMA, VCU, & Doctor Who
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Basketball Capital of the World
Posts: 14,324
Send a message via AIM to VCURamFan
Default

And the result: http://www.mmamania.com/2012/1/22/27...ufc-com-hacked

Quote:
Just hours ago, UFC.com was hacked by a group calling itself the Underground Nazi HackerGroup. Visiting the site simply led viewers to the picture you see above and a goofy song.

The UFC recently came out in vocal support for the anti-piracy legislation SOPA, which is what led to the hackers taking this action against their website.

According to the hacker's twitter account, his name is Josh Matthews. He was very upset about the shutdown of MegaUpload over SOPA, saying "how does the government have more power than us people?"

UFC President Dana White responded when asked on Twitter in a very peculiar way.

Dana White responds to the hacking:


As of 6:45 p.m. EST the DNS seems to have been reset and UFC.com no longer loads. It's probably going to come back online shortly.

Here's a screenshot from 7:43 p.m. EST:
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-23-2012, 01:25 PM
Llamafighter's Avatar
Llamafighter Llamafighter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Astoria, New York
Posts: 4,982
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VCURamFan View Post
I saw the UFC.com site was not working and sent Dana a twitter. so weird. didn't realize thsi was going on.
__________________
"Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear - not absence of fear."
-Mark Twain

[
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-23-2012, 04:25 PM
Bonnie Bonnie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Where the bluebonnets bloom
Posts: 6,634
Default

Maybe Lorenzo did not realize the far reaching consequences these bills would have on everyone who uses the Internet including themselves. Likewise with Hollywood and other entertainment industries, I don't think they've considered the boomerang effect these bills would have on their own interests. As for Hollywood's political toadies in Washington doing their bidding, all they see is big campaign $$$$$$ and votes.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-23-2012, 05:15 PM
rockdawg21's Avatar
rockdawg21 rockdawg21 is offline
I'm kind of a big deal
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 5,584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Llamafighter View Post
I saw the UFC.com site was not working and sent Dana a twitter. so weird. didn't realize thsi was going on.
Did he reply with "Who gives a ?"
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-23-2012, 05:56 PM
Tyburn's Avatar
Tyburn Tyburn is offline
Angry @ Injustice!
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: England
Posts: 16,951
Default

Lorenzo is only thinking about himself.

This is the biggest problem with the UFC, and its sad to see it eminating higher then Dana White.

Lorenzo would support a piracy act because the UFC want sole dominance over their material. The fact he would do that at the expense of the Censorship side of the Bill is worth noting...because the UFC only thinks about itself..NOT about its fans, and NOT about its fighters.

For example, The UFC double their output a year, and keep the prices the same making a fortune rather then showing some compassion towards their fans. They reply by putting their stuff on channels you have to pay extra for, or free facebook fights THAT DONT WORK FOR HALF THE VIEWERS

For Example, The UFC are desperate to expand into new countries, without first having a solid basis in any of them. Suddenly, the UFC dont do three outings to England anymore...only one...because they are too busy putting events on in Saudi, or Mongolia...or whatever. Their belief that expansion at the neglect of their fans is good, and the before example is driven by money.

Actually, they just want a nice tidy profit. Its most dissapointing to me, because I thought Lorenzo was actually a reasonable person. More reasonable then Dana maybe, but only on a scale of degrees.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-23-2012, 06:08 PM
Tyburn's Avatar
Tyburn Tyburn is offline
Angry @ Injustice!
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: England
Posts: 16,951
Default

Dana White basically saying "no comment" cracks me up somewhat
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-23-2012, 07:04 PM
rearnakedchoke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyburn View Post
Lorenzo is only thinking about himself.

This is the biggest problem with the UFC, and its sad to see it eminating higher then Dana White.

Lorenzo would support a piracy act because the UFC want sole dominance over their material. The fact he would do that at the expense of the Censorship side of the Bill is worth noting...because the UFC only thinks about itself..NOT about its fans, and NOT about its fighters.

For example, The UFC double their output a year, and keep the prices the same making a fortune rather then showing some compassion towards their fans. They reply by putting their stuff on channels you have to pay extra for, or free facebook fights THAT DONT WORK FOR HALF THE VIEWERS

For Example, The UFC are desperate to expand into new countries, without first having a solid basis in any of them. Suddenly, the UFC dont do three outings to England anymore...only one...because they are too busy putting events on in Saudi, or Mongolia...or whatever. Their belief that expansion at the neglect of their fans is good, and the before example is driven by money.

Actually, they just want a nice tidy profit. Its most dissapointing to me, because I thought Lorenzo was actually a reasonable person. More reasonable then Dana maybe, but only on a scale of degrees.
i think you should make a video blog or recap about it and send it to zuffa .. you may be able to sway them
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-23-2012, 07:12 PM
County Mike
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyburn View Post
Lorenzo is only thinking about himself.

This is the biggest problem with the UFC, and its sad to see it eminating higher then Dana White.

Lorenzo would support a piracy act because the UFC want sole dominance over their material. The fact he would do that at the expense of the Censorship side of the Bill is worth noting...because the UFC only thinks about itself..NOT about its fans, and NOT about its fighters.

For example, The UFC double their output a year, and keep the prices the same making a fortune rather then showing some compassion towards their fans. They reply by putting their stuff on channels you have to pay extra for, or free facebook fights THAT DONT WORK FOR HALF THE VIEWERS

For Example, The UFC are desperate to expand into new countries, without first having a solid basis in any of them. Suddenly, the UFC dont do three outings to England anymore...only one...because they are too busy putting events on in Saudi, or Mongolia...or whatever. Their belief that expansion at the neglect of their fans is good, and the before example is driven by money.

Actually, they just want a nice tidy profit. Its most dissapointing to me, because I thought Lorenzo was actually a reasonable person. More reasonable then Dana maybe, but only on a scale of degrees.
Can you believe these guys? Trying to be capitalists in America! How dare they! They should give away half of their earnings to a bunch of people who've done nothing to earn it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-23-2012, 07:41 PM
VCURamFan's Avatar
VCURamFan VCURamFan is online now
MMA, VCU, & Doctor Who
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Basketball Capital of the World
Posts: 14,324
Send a message via AIM to VCURamFan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by County Mike View Post
Can you believe these guys? Trying to be capitalists in America! How dare they! They should give away half of their earnings to a bunch of people who've done nothing to earn it.
I know, right? It's so totally inappropriate for them to attempt to better their company! See, they don't understand the rest of the world. If they want to be globally loved, they've gotta become socialists & cow-tow to the lowest common denominator.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.