Go Back   Matt-Hughes.com Official Forums > General Discussions > The Woodshed

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-05-2011, 09:58 PM
Chris F
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Casey Anothy Verdict my take

http://southronpartisan.blogspot.com...u-serious.html

This was a travesty sure enough but not a surprise at all
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-05-2011, 10:04 PM
matthughesfan21
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Disgusting....a murderer walks free, but worse than that, a child murderer.....Anyone with half a brain knows she was guilty, she couldn't keep her story straight and was convicted of lying, but not murder, WHAT?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-05-2011, 10:09 PM
Chris F
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matthughesfan21 View Post
Disgusting....a murderer walks free, but worse than that, a child murderer.....Anyone with half a brain knows she was guilty, she couldn't keep her story straight and was convicted of lying, but not murder, WHAT?
I wish I could have been a fly on the wall during deliberation to see what on earth those people were thinking. My guess is lets just get out of here say she is guilty on the lesser charge and get home for some BBQ and fireworks
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-05-2011, 10:32 PM
matthughesfan21
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris F View Post
I wish I could have been a fly on the wall during deliberation to see what on earth those people were thinking. My guess is lets just get out of here say she is guilty on the lesser charge and get home for some BBQ and fireworks
Just sickening, complete injustice...Was this the same jury from the OJ murder trial?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-06-2011, 12:32 AM
F34R F34R is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,101
Default

I don't know whether she was guilty or not, but...

Can those that think she was guilty explain the evidence that they heard that proves she murdered the child? Maybe I missed that part.

The link in the OP is an intolerable rant of a lunatic I think.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-06-2011, 12:40 AM
Chris F
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by F34R View Post
I don't know whether she was guilty or not, but...

Can those that think she was guilty explain the evidence that they heard that proves she murdered the child? Maybe I missed that part.

The link in the OP is an intolerable rant of a lunatic I think.
It would take a few days just go to just about any new source and they will have video I bet on the trial. They had everything they needed. The DA just could not present it in a way to overwhelm the huge doubt the defense put on. They threw out so many what if that the jury had no idea what to think. The Defense does not have to prove their theories just make people doubt. They changed their story about 12 times in 3 years. If I were on the jury I would not have said not guilty but I also have followed the case for 3 years and these jurors supposedly have not and so this could be why they were so ignorant.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-06-2011, 12:41 AM
Vizion's Avatar
Vizion Vizion is offline
Hughes fanboy
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,218
Default

Was the preponderance of empirally deductive evidence sufficient to sentence her guilty?
__________________


Please consider England in your prayers!

http://www.intercessuk.org/iuk3/
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-06-2011, 12:52 AM
F34R F34R is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,101
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris F View Post
It would take a few days just go to just about any new source and they will have video I bet on the trial. They had everything they needed. The DA just could not present it in a way to overwhelm the huge doubt the defense put on. They threw out so many what if that the jury had no idea what to think. The Defense does not have to prove their theories just make people doubt. They changed their story about 12 times in 3 years. If I were on the jury I would not have said not guilty but I also have followed the case for 3 years and these jurors supposedly have not and so this could be why they were so ignorant.
A few days? To explain what evidence showed that she did it? I have plenty of time.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-06-2011, 01:58 AM
ufcfan2
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by F34R View Post
I don't know whether she was guilty or not, but...

Can those that think she was guilty explain the evidence that they heard that proves she murdered the child? Maybe I missed that part.

The link in the OP is an intolerable rant of a lunatic I think.
I think there was alot of circumstantial evidence out there and alot of what the 'state' had was explained away even with the weak defense's stories. I don't think either side could actually come up with on how she actually died. They even had their forensic experts not know conclusively how she died.
I'm glad I wasn't on the jury as it would be hard to put ur emotions aside and just go by facts and the law. Some ppl couldn't do it as its guilty no matter as the media portrayed it,and its hard to cipher media ponder when ur emotions are being fueld by the media, so I can't imagine how this jury did that.
Whether u agree or not agree with verdict this is our justice system and u live and die by it. How many guilty ppl are really innocent and vice versa...
Any-who, I kindof hope they continue an investigation, but I seriously doubt they've got the resources to continue it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-06-2011, 02:01 AM
Chris F
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vizion View Post
Was the preponderance of empirally deductive evidence sufficient to sentence her guilty?
Yes
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.