Go Back   Matt-Hughes.com Official Forums > MMA Related > UFC

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-02-2011, 06:23 PM
VCURamFan's Avatar
VCURamFan VCURamFan is offline
MMA, VCU, & Doctor Who
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Basketball Capital of the World
Posts: 14,324
Send a message via AIM to VCURamFan
Default As TV Deal Winds Down, UFC Will Choose Between Spike or New Home


From MMAFighting.com:

Quote:
Wednesday night marked the season finale of the UFC's major programming vehicle, The Ultimate Fighter. It also marked the unofficial beginning of a countdown to the zero hour when the promotion will be faced with a major decision about the fate of its key show. Its current deal with longtime home Spike expires at the end of 2011, following the 14th season of TUF.

According to most observers within the industry, selling the television rights package is the single most important priority for the UFC, and as of now, it remains open for negotiation, a showpiece with bidders circling but no deal yet reached.

While the UFC and Spike remain the main players and talks between the two remain ongoing, the two sides aren't the only ones involved. In a drama that has played out over recent months and is expected to drag on into the near future in executive boardrooms, other suitors will continue to try to convince the UFC to abandon its longtime home.

Chief among the possible new landing spots is Versus, which is soon to be re-branded as "NBC Sports Channel," or some similar variation, and with which the UFC already has a solid relationship. In 2007, UFC parent company Zuffa struck a deal to broadcast its WEC brand on Versus, and in Dec. 2009, the two sides increased their investment in each other, with Versus beginning to air UFC events as well. The UFC's current deal with Versus allows them to broadcast four live events in 2011.

While TV ratings on Spike have generally been higher than those on Versus, it's not so simple as ratings or money, according to those in the know. The UFC is also hopeful of a partner that will allow them to leverage other assets past the airtime of an event. That would seem to favor Comcast, which can boast the assets of NBC at its disposal, including the possibility of multiple cable channels, morning shows and late-night programming.

Yet within the UFC, there is still an appreciation for Spike's willingness to air its product when no one else would. There is also a certain ease to their relationship that only comes with time.

"Yeah, absolutely, our preference is to stay with them," UFC president Dana White said in a recent exclusive interview with MMA Fighting. "Obviously we've been with them forever. We have a great relationship. There's a little comfort being there."

Still, there have been at least some signs of tension over the last few months. For one, Spike changed TUF's start time from its customary 10 pm slot to 9 pm this season, a shift that White said was partially responsible for the lower-than-expected ratings. And while Spike declined to comment on ongoing negotiations, a company source questioned some of the booking choices the UFC has made for its Fight Night events.

As an example, he wondered how large an audience would have been drawn to Randy Couture's last fight had it been the main event of a Spike show rather than airing on pay-per-view.

"I'm not saying they're not giving us good fights, but there's a difference between good fights and marquee names," the source said. "The good fights pull in UFC fans, but the marquee names are the ones that pull in sports fans. That's how you get those monster ratings."

Privately, Spike executives are hopeful of retaining a sports property that helped their cable network build an identity, but it's clear it's no sure thing. A source with knowledge of the situation told MMA Fighting that Spike has had production executives in attendance at some Bellator events, perhaps keeping an eye on a potential replacement should UFC bolt.

Still, Spike believes its history of working closely with the UFC will win out, noting how many hours the channel devotes to the UFC, and wondering if anyone else could offer the same. While the UFC is a major property for Spike, that might not necessarily be the case at another cabler. It's also worth noting that Spike is available in 99.4 million homes, about 20 million more than Versus, its most likely rival.

White bluntly says that the promotion is talking to "everybody," weighing their options as they take their prime platform into free agency. It's a deal that may not have long to finalize. While White gave a six-month timeframe for completion, it's likely that both the UFC and Spike will know the fate of a new deal much earlier than that. If the UFC leaves, it will need at least a few months to get the news out and promote its new TV home. Likewise, Spike would require some time to adjust its schedule and advertise a new Wednesday night lineup.

One source said it is likely we will know the answer to TUF's 2012 home before TUF 14 starts broadcasting in September. That leaves just about three months in which to strike a deal.

"We're talking to everybody, and when I say we're talking to everybody, we're talking to everybody," White said. "That's what you do when your deal is up. With Spike, it's normal s---. What's going on right now is normal. There is nothing abnormal about what's going on."

Where the UFC ends up is anyone's guess. UFC and Spike officials talk regularly, according to White, and both sides say the relationship is hardly strained despite the uncertainty of the future.

If you want to read into the tea leaves, recent signs have been more positive. Just days ago, the UFC and Spike announced that Jason "Mayhem" Miller would be one of the coaches on TUF, lending his "Bully Beatdown" reality show fame to the franchise. In addition, both White and a Spike source said it's quite likely that TUF will be back on at 10 pm next season, putting the show back into its historic slot.

Spike and the UFC helped make each other, and the relationship remains in good working order, even with a looming deadline. That, of course, will change if another cable channel wedges their way in between them. Time for negotiations is running short, and very soon, a decision will have to be made about the UFC's future home. It may not be the revenue driver that pay-per-view is, but the TV rights deal is a potentially huge step forward as the UFC continues its plan to expand its reach worldwide. Six years into its run on Spike, the UFC's television future is alternatively full of uncertainty and full of promise.

"Where could we end up? Anything is possible," White said. "Nothing is impossible."
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-02-2011, 06:59 PM
flo's Avatar
flo flo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Great Pacific Northwest
Posts: 7,757
Default

I think Versus will give Spike a run for their money. But maybe the long-term relationship with Spike will win out in the long run? Versus might garner Zuffa more viewers.

Quote:
The UFC is also hopeful of a partner that will allow them to leverage other assets past the airtime of an event. That would seem to favor Comcast, which can boast the assets of NBC at its disposal, including the possibility of multiple cable channels, morning shows and late-night programming.
I just don't understand this "leverage other assets past the airtime of an event". How would Comcast be any different than DishNet or DirecTV? They all offer Spike, Versus and any other channel that would televise UFC events, don't they? How does it favor Comcast?

And for full disclosure, the evil Comcast is on my s***list for raising their rates AGAIN at the worst possible time for us consumers, what with steep gas prices and groceries going up every week. And this is after net profits of $943 million for the first quarter of 2011, up 9%!!! grrrr
__________________
http://www.matt-hughes.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=339&dateline=13068036  43

Rejoice ever more. 1 Thessalonians 5:16
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-02-2011, 07:11 PM
VCURamFan's Avatar
VCURamFan VCURamFan is offline
MMA, VCU, & Doctor Who
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Basketball Capital of the World
Posts: 14,324
Send a message via AIM to VCURamFan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flo View Post
I think Versus will give Spike a run for their money. But maybe the long-term relationship with Spike will win out in the long run? Versus might garner Zuffa more viewers.



I just don't understand this "leverage other assets past the airtime of an event". How would Comcast be any different than DishNet or DirecTV? They all offer Spike, Versus and any other channel that would televise UFC events, don't they? How does it favor Comcast?

And for full disclosure, the evil Comcast is on my s***list for raising their rates AGAIN at the worst possible time for us consumers, what with steep gas prices and groceries going up every week. And this is after net profits of $943 million for the first quarter of 2011, up 9%!!! grrrr
It means they can get them into more interviews, appearances, guest starring roles, etc. Comcast owns NBC, so a partnership with Comcast is also a partnership with NBC & all of the channels associated with it.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-02-2011, 07:17 PM
flo's Avatar
flo flo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Great Pacific Northwest
Posts: 7,757
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VCURamFan View Post
It means they can get them into more interviews, appearances, guest starring roles, etc. Comcast owns NBC, so a partnership with Comcast is also a partnership with NBC & all of the channels associated with it.
I see what you mean, Ben, thanks.
__________________
http://www.matt-hughes.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=339&dateline=13068036  43

Rejoice ever more. 1 Thessalonians 5:16
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-03-2011, 05:19 AM
KENTUCKYREDBONE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Unless there's some control issue's UFC would probably be wise to stay with Spike! As for Versus I doubt it gets in near as many homes as spike.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-03-2011, 12:14 PM
Spiritwalker's Avatar
Spiritwalker Spiritwalker is offline
Matt-4; GJJ Black Belts-0
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Gastonia NC
Posts: 4,339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KENTUCKYREDBONE View Post
Unless there's some control issue's UFC would probably be wise to stay with Spike! As for Versus I doubt it gets in near as many homes as spike.

Spike and Versus both are part of the "Basic" Cable TV package... (cable TV without the set top box) so.. those numbers would be pretty much the same..

With the coming re-branding of Versus, it would make sense for them to have it to make a splash with the name change.
__________________
It is because you chose to get on the mat that makes you the winner. Think about how many people are not on that mat right now. - Luis Sucuri Togno
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-04-2011, 12:27 AM
3dlee
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The UFC will ofcourse do whatever is the best for them control wise and financially. I hope that the channel that offers them the best of all worlds is SPIKE. To me, SPIKEtv and UFC are virtually synonomous. I easily would miss UFC on versus if it werent for being online daily. I love how much UFC that spike shows and I really like their formats and production of UFC events. SPIKEtv FTW hopefully. I am personally very comfortanle with UFC being on Spike.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.