Go Back   Matt-Hughes.com Official Forums > General Discussions > Politics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-24-2011, 11:44 AM
Spiritwalker's Avatar
Spiritwalker Spiritwalker is offline
Matt-4; GJJ Black Belts-0
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Gastonia NC
Posts: 4,339
Default Why was 4-year-old American girl deported?

This should be interesting.... in hearing fomr the parent here.. and the non-parents.

http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/03/2...ex.html?hpt=T2


Quote:
San Diego (CNN) -- Under our system, two things are crystal clear: Law enforcement agencies are required to treat children with more care than adults, and U.S. citizens have certain rights that are not to be abridged -- including the right to due process.

Just don't try telling any of that to the parents of Emily Ruiz. They know better. Those principles didn't apply in the case of the 4-year-old from Brentwood, New York, who -- after traveling to Guatemala to visit relatives with her grandfather -- was denied entry into the United States on March 11 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection and instead sent back to Guatemala.

That is no way to treat a U.S. citizen. You see, while both of her parents are illegal immigrants, Emily was born in the United States and so she is a U.S. citizen. That is supposed to mean something in this country. At the very least, it should mean that authorities shouldn't have done anything more than greet the little girl with a polite and sincere: "Welcome home."

Instead, according to her family's attorney, Emily was detained alone for several hours at Dulles International Airport while authorities tried to figure out what to do and while her grandfather was treated for what seemed to be a panic attack.

"It's outrageous," David Sperling, the family's attorney, told me. "Effectively, she (Emily) was deported. They treated her like an 'anchor baby,' like a second-class citizen. I can't imagine that they would treat any other U.S. citizen this way."

Speaking of so-called anchor babies, an offensive term used by some on the right to describe the U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants who supposedly keep their parents anchored in the United States, this case shows that the whole concept is bogus. Emily couldn't even keep herself anchored in the United States, let alone her parents.

I asked Sperling if he believed that Emily was treated shoddily because she is Latina.

"Absolutely," he said. "If this was a Caucasian girl from some European country, this would never have happened."

According to multiple accounts, here is what happened. At the end of their stay in Guatemala, Emily and her grandfather boarded a plane to return to New York. The grandfather had a work visa and a notarized letter from Emily's parents authorizing him to travel with her. The girl had a U.S. passport. But because of bad weather, the flight was diverted to Washington.

When the two landed there, and went through the processing for re-entry in the United States, it was discovered that the grandfather's visa was no longer valid and that he had a prior arrest for illegal entry in the 1990s. Agents took him into custody and prepared to deport him back to Guatemala.

But what about Emily? When she and her grandfather didn't get off the plane in New York, her father, Leonel, called the airline, and a representative told him that U.S. immigration officials had detained his loved ones in Washington. So then the father called the immigration officials. And, when he was asked about his own immigration status and that of his wife's, he acknowledged that they were both undocumented.

According to Sperling, the father then was given a choice: Emily could be left in a children's detention facility or sent back to Guatemala with her grandfather. The father said he would prefer that Emily stay with her grandfather, and so Emily was deported from the country -- her country.

But oddly enough, the attorney said, the one option the father wasn't given was to go pick up his daughter in Washington. That's what he planned to do, he told The New York Times, but he was never given the chance. (The same article said that officials at Customs and Border Protection gave Ruiz the opportunity to collect her at the airport.)

Officials with Customs and Border Protection declined to comment to me on the record. The best they would do is a statement sent to news agencies declaring that "CBP strives to reunite U.S. citizen children with their parents," without actually saying that it happened in this case.

Sperling told me he plans to travel to Guatemala next week to retrieve Emily.

The idea of an illegal immigrant voluntarily meeting with U.S. immigration officials is not as far-fetched as you might think. Leonel Ruiz is an illegal immigrant, but he is also a father. Besides, if he had come forward, according to immigration lawyers and immigration enforcement officials I've spoke to over the years, he might not have been apprehended and deported. Immigration officials have wide discretion, and they don't have to deport every illegal immigrant with whom they come into contact.

Don't lose sight of the facts through the PR. Or is it CYA? Even if it's true that that Emily's father gave permission for the government to send his daughter back to Guatemala, that doesn't let U.S. officials off the hook. Emily is a minor, but she is also a U.S. citizen with a right to due process -- what Thomas Jefferson called an "inalienable" right granted her not by her father but by her creator.

It's not fair or appropriate for Customs and Border Protection to pawn off the awesome responsibility of whether Emily stays in the United States or goes back to Guatemala to the father just so they can wash their hands of this case and claim they were just following orders.

There are established rules and procedures for how U.S. immigration enforcement agencies are supposed to deal with minors, and those guidelines are set by years of legal precedent. Most of them deal with minors who are in the country illegally and yet still have rights. U.S. citizens have even more rights.

The unanswered question in this case is whether Customs and Border Protection followed those rules and its own procedures and did everything it could to reunite Emily with her family. It doesn't look like it. Rather it looks like U.S. immigration officials couldn't wait to get this girl on a plane and get her off their hands.

What has happened to our country? Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano seems to brag about the Obama administration's record number of deportations every few weeks, to counter claims that her department is soft on illegal immigration. Has the administration so depleted the pool of illegal immigrants that it's moved on to deporting U.S. citizens?

The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs should look into this case, and the Department of Homeland Security should launch an internal investigation. And if it is ultimately decided that Customs and Border Protection officials acted hastily and irresponsibly, they should lose their jobs --as swiftly and as easily as Emily Ruiz lost the freedom that was her birthright.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Ruben Navarrette Jr.
__________________
It is because you chose to get on the mat that makes you the winner. Think about how many people are not on that mat right now. - Luis Sucuri Togno
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-24-2011, 01:13 PM
Dethbob
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It sounds to me like she was not deported; she was left in the care of her legal guardian, who was deported.

The father could have gone to the airport to pick her up, but he was afraid to because he was breaking the law; is that the governments fault? If this guy wants to rant about the girls rights, perhaps he could tell us what he thinks the government should have done. Let a four year old girl walk home from the airport?

What he really wants is for us to just stop enforcing the law, but I donít think that will happen.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-24-2011, 01:42 PM
County Mike
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
"It's outrageous," David Sperling, the family's attorney, told me. "Effectively, she (Emily) was deported. They treated her like an 'anchor baby,' like a second-class citizen. I can't imagine that they would treat any other U.S. citizen this way."
They treated her like an anchor baby because she is one. That's one of the laws I would really like to see modified. If a woman is in a country illegally, giving birth should not instantly grant citizenship to the child. If she's there legally, then I'm fine with it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-24-2011, 03:09 PM
Spiritwalker's Avatar
Spiritwalker Spiritwalker is offline
Matt-4; GJJ Black Belts-0
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Gastonia NC
Posts: 4,339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dethbob View Post
It sounds to me like she was not deported; she was left in the care of her legal guardian, who was deported.

The father could have gone to the airport to pick her up, but he was afraid to because he was breaking the law; is that the governments fault? If this guy wants to rant about the girls rights, perhaps he could tell us what he thinks the government should have done. Let a four year old girl walk home from the airport?

What he really wants is for us to just stop enforcing the law, but I donít think that will happen.
Leave it to you to be all logical and stuff.....

My things was the HUGE SLANT that the writer was using... Talk about twisting the fact to fit the agenda...
__________________
It is because you chose to get on the mat that makes you the winner. Think about how many people are not on that mat right now. - Luis Sucuri Togno
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-24-2011, 03:10 PM
Chuck
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I agree with Mike. If you're a child born in the U.S. but your parents are illegals you should not be a citizen.

I think what they did was compassionate. They could have tracked down and deported both the parents and left the little girl here in State custody.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-24-2011, 03:20 PM
DonnaMaria
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck View Post
I agree with Mike. If you're a child born in the U.S. but your parents are illegals you should not be a citizen.I think what they did was compassionate. They could have tracked down and deported both the parents and left the little girl here in State custody.
I agree!

Again, the parents are to blame for this situation and the grandfather. They created the situation by being here illegally.

I say this as the great granddaughter of immigrants who had to enter this country legally AND healthy.

AND they learned English AND they worked hard AND they didn't expect anything from the government. They were just glad to be here.

so maybe I'm just biased, but that's how I feel. It's a terrible situation that the child had to go through, but one that is her parents fault.

Last edited by DonnaMaria; 03-24-2011 at 03:32 PM. Reason: typo....again!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-24-2011, 03:30 PM
rockdawg21's Avatar
rockdawg21 rockdawg21 is offline
I'm kind of a big deal
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 5,584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by County Mike View Post
They treated her like an anchor baby because she is one. That's one of the laws I would really like to see modified. If a woman is in a country illegally, giving birth should not instantly grant citizenship to the child. If she's there legally, then I'm fine with it.
+1
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-24-2011, 03:42 PM
Spiritwalker's Avatar
Spiritwalker Spiritwalker is offline
Matt-4; GJJ Black Belts-0
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Gastonia NC
Posts: 4,339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by County Mike View Post
They treated her like an anchor baby because she is one. That's one of the laws I would really like to see modified. If a woman is in a country illegally, giving birth should not instantly grant citizenship to the child. If she's there legally, then I'm fine with it.
Nah...

If your born in the states.. you should have all rights and protections that our Constitution offers...

It doesn't mean that it's right to sneak over.. pop a child out and then ride their coat tails to the streets of gold..

One thing I wonder.. if a soon to be mom is visiting her imagrated parents .. and has a baby... the baby is an automatic American.. What if the country that the mom is from.. doesn't allow the baby back due to some law that they have...because we claim rights to all people born under our flag...

And what if the mom is deemed unfit.. or abuses the child in her home country?? Can the US go and get it's people to protect them from harm??
__________________
It is because you chose to get on the mat that makes you the winner. Think about how many people are not on that mat right now. - Luis Sucuri Togno
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-24-2011, 03:44 PM
Chuck
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonnaMaria View Post
I say this as the great granddaughter of immigrants who had to enter this county legally AND healthy.

AND they learned English AND they worked hard AND they didn't expect anything from the government. They were just glad to be here.
I'm the Grandson of immigrants who also entered this country legally, worked hard and earned their own way.

Grandpa was here under protest though, he died refusing to speak English!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-24-2011, 03:46 PM
VCURamFan's Avatar
VCURamFan VCURamFan is online now
Allons-y
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Basketball Capital of the World
Posts: 14,292
Send a message via AIM to VCURamFan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck View Post
I'm the Grandson of immigrants who also entered this country legally, worked hard and earned their own way.

Grandpa was here under protest though, he died refusing to speak English!
Kinda how you refuse to wear real shoes?


(they're Italian )
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.