Go Back   Matt-Hughes.com Official Forums > MMA Related > MMA

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 03-05-2011, 10:03 AM
bj44's Avatar
bj44 bj44 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rev View Post
LOL I know who he is and still aint impressed. Yes he was the HW champ. WAS!!!! like 100 yrs ago. (So was Ricco Rodrigez) What has he done to be in the top 10 right now?
NOTHING!!!!
I loved seeing Rizzo giving him the unreal ko from the side way back when. EPIC!!
you must of missed the rematch between them then.... I saw an old fight where frank mir got knocked out by ian freeman.. He must suck right???
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-05-2011, 02:19 PM
Rev
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bj44 View Post
you must of missed the rematch between them then.... I saw an old fight where frank mir got knocked out by ian freeman.. He must suck right???
LOL
You know what, you're right, I dont know what I'm talking about. Mir does suck because he got knocked out way back when by Freeman.
And no I must not have seen the Rematch in affliction(100 yrs later) when Barnett ko'd Rizzo, Please tell me what happened!!!!
What does anything you posted there have to do with anything that I posted?
OOOOOOH, Josh beat Randy 100 yrs ago!! He must be the man!! Randy must just be really lucky that Josh left and let him win some fights. Thanks Josh!!!
Royce won ufc 1, he is the greatest!!!

My point, EVERYONE'S point, is. How is Josh relevent NOW??!!??!!
I want you to tell me how he ranks top 10. Nothing else.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-05-2011, 07:54 PM
bj44's Avatar
bj44 bj44 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rev View Post
LOL
You know what, you're right, I dont know what I'm talking about. Mir does suck because he got knocked out way back when by Freeman.
And no I must not have seen the Rematch in affliction(100 yrs later) when Barnett ko'd Rizzo, Please tell me what happened!!!!
What does anything you posted there have to do with anything that I posted?
OOOOOOH, Josh beat Randy 100 yrs ago!! He must be the man!! Randy must just be really lucky that Josh left and let him win some fights. Thanks Josh!!!
Royce won ufc 1, he is the greatest!!!

My point, EVERYONE'S point, is. How is Josh relevent NOW??!!??!!
I want you to tell me how he ranks top 10. Nothing else.
I never said he was top ten he hasnt fought a top 10 oppenent in 4 years... But to say he doesnt belong in the tournament is a joke... When he won the hw title 8 years ago he was also the youngest one ever to do it... He is not old and irrevelent in the sport... He is 33 years old...If mark hunt can still win fights in the ufc then barnett is def still relevent
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-06-2011, 01:45 AM
Rev
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Never said he was old, just irrelevent. I'm not sure anyone said that he didnt belong in the tournament, I know I didnt. I just said that he wasnt top 10 and niether was Rogers. I said this after someone said that 3-4 of the top 10 in the world are in the tournament.

And come on, Hunt won a fight in the UFC. Does this make him relevent?
Why would it make Josh?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-06-2011, 12:16 PM
bj44's Avatar
bj44 bj44 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rev View Post
Never said he was old, just irrelevent. I'm not sure anyone said that he didnt belong in the tournament, I know I didnt. I just said that he wasnt top 10 and niether was Rogers. I said this after someone said that 3-4 of the top 10 in the world are in the tournament.

And come on, Hunt won a fight in the UFC. Does this make him relevent?
Why would it make Josh?
i said that 3-4.... werum, fedor, overeem maybe silva... def didnt mean barnett
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-06-2011, 08:41 PM