![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
http://www.salon.com/life/pinched/20...hed/index.html
Quote:
__________________
"Be of good comfort, Master Ridley, and play the man! We shall this day light such a candle, by God's grace, in England, as I trust shall never be put out." --Hugh Latimer, October 16, 1555 |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
So goes the tale of entitlements.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm not sure if I get the problem...is it that they are on food stamps period or that they are eating healthy food?
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
These were the paragraphs that stood out to me.
Quote:
For me, it's not so much what they bought with their food stamps - oh wait, must use the PC wording - Electronic Transfer Benefit Card, but that they even GET food stamps. I was unemployed at different times when I was in my 20's and I did draw unemployment but never considered applying for food stamps. And with benefits being extended to 90 weeks (or something like that) I think there's no reason for these single kids to be using a government subsidy that was meant to help people in dire need. Shane just posted recently that his family is going through a very rough time but I'd be willing to bet they aren't shopping at Whole Foods. OK, rant over. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Our national debt is currently at: ![]() We do not need to be buying gourmet food for entitled hipsters.
__________________
"Be of good comfort, Master Ridley, and play the man! We shall this day light such a candle, by God's grace, in England, as I trust shall never be put out." --Hugh Latimer, October 16, 1555 |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
) should be with the system in place and those that put it there. Not with the people receiving the benefits.Quote:
This may be the first time I've ever disagreed with either one of you but in this case I not only disagree with your comments I'm a little disappointed in them. IF these people qualify for food stamps than they should be able to use them any way they choose. To have it any other way would simply mean more government control in our lives. There is often this mindset when it comes to Welfare that "we" are paying for "them" and it's simply not true. Not everybody on public assistance is a dead beat or a crack head. I find it surprising that you would not only judge the people written about in this article but actually be in favor of MORE government control than we already have now. Do you think they should have to live on bread and water? Only generic foods? All I really took from the article was that they are eating healthy and I really don't see a problem with that. If you think the eligibility requirement for aid are too low then your argument should be with the government and not the people receiving the help. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Chuck, I don't see anything wrong or "disappointing" in what I wrote or what Flo wrote.
The article was about "Hipsters on Food Stamps" not about children dying of kwashiorkor. The food stamp rules were changed by Obama as part of his stimulus package - they were meant as a stimulus to the economy, not as a response to people dying of hunger. If you are aware of a pre-Obama epidemic of starvation among poetry grad students please post the links. The article is about "foodies". These people are obsessed with food as a status symbol; they are not primarily concerned about the health effects. There is no significant nutritional difference between Perrier and tap water. The effect of eating organic produce vs. regular produce on one's life span is likewise doubtful. Generally, people that are feasting on gourmet ice cream and game basted in butter are not that concerned about their cholesterol. These people are food snobs, not health food fanatics. I have never used food stamps but I have had my food paid for by others. Numerous times we have been invited to dinner at restaurants by other couples. We, of course, offer to pay, but when the other couple offers the invitation, they usually pay. Usually the couples we dine with are not wealthy, they are of modest means. By your logic, since they offered to pay, should I feel no compunction about ordering Kobe beef, Lobster and a bottle of Chateau Lafite Rothschild? Instead, I skip the appetizer, don't order a drink of alcohol, skip dessert and order a modestly priced chicken dinner in order to keep the bill low. Because others are paying for the meal, I deny myself and order inexpensive options. Similarly, I have had expense accounts for meals. The non-profit corporation was worth billions. Still, I didn't run up a bill with extravagant food and drink selections. I kept my selections modest because I was spending other people's money. It is common parlance for a taxpayer to refer to "my dime" as referring, in general, to taxpayer money. I don't think anyone (including me) was under the impression that a single taxpayer funds the food stamp program. We don't shop at Whole Foods. I went one time and bought a cupcake for my child. When I went to the register and found out the price, we never went back again. We shop at Costco, Wal-mart and our local discount grocery store. I find it ironic that the guy on food stamps says he is a foodie who doesn't do the "living off ramen' thing" while my cupboard has Ichiban chicken-flavored Saimin (aka ramen noodles) and I am looking at a six figure tax bill. I have no problem helping needy people buy food. I donate to the local food bank and donate to the local rescue mission/soup kitchen. I have a problem with people supposedly in dire circumstances purchasing food like they are a critic on the Food Channel. I am not even necessarily saying that the purchases have to be below the level of the average American; however, they certainly shouldn't be above. By the way, I don't have a beef with you. If you have a beef with me that is ok . . . just don't make it a grass-fed beef.
__________________
"Be of good comfort, Master Ridley, and play the man! We shall this day light such a candle, by God's grace, in England, as I trust shall never be put out." --Hugh Latimer, October 16, 1555 |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
There is always that element, sadly. A person close to me was complaining about not getting the tax rebate that a lot of people received a few years ago (I think it was $600, IIRC). I told them "but you didn't get it because you make too much money". They didn't appreciate the comment as they thought it was their due and I was sad because I thought they were kind of greedy. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|