Go Back   Matt-Hughes.com Official Forums > General Discussions > Politics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-10-2010, 03:30 AM
Neezar's Avatar
Neezar Neezar is offline
SupaDupaMod
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: South
Posts: 6,484
Send a message via Yahoo to Neezar
Default Bush Billboard For Real






http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts1122
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-10-2010, 03:50 AM
NateR's Avatar
NateR NateR is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,742
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neezar View Post
YES!!!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-10-2010, 06:18 PM
DonnaMaria
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

hahaha! Love it! Brilliant!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-10-2010, 07:25 PM
billwilliams70
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Funny, the coolest thing is that it's real and not some rumor.

Later.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-10-2010, 09:01 PM
Buzzard
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I miss him like a bad case of the flu.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-11-2010, 01:12 AM
KENTUCKYREDBONE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Obama sure does make me miss Bush!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-11-2010, 01:28 AM
Vizion's Avatar
Vizion Vizion is offline
Hughes fanboy
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,218
Default

I know a guy who knows the guy who did this.

And yes, Obama makes me miss Bush too.
__________________


Please consider England in your prayers!

http://www.intercessuk.org/iuk3/
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-11-2010, 11:19 PM
Tyburn's Avatar
Tyburn Tyburn is offline
Angry @ Injustice!
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: England
Posts: 16,982
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NateR View Post
YES!!!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-12-2010, 02:38 PM
TheConcretekid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I miss the 4,376 US soldiers that died in Iraq... you know that country with no weapons of mass destruction and no ties to terrorism and no links to 9/11. Meanwhile the 2,973 victims of 9/11 (you'll note that this number is about 1.5 times less than the number of soldiers that were sent to their deaths by Bush) are still waiting for justice
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-12-2010, 04:38 PM
TexasRN's Avatar
TexasRN TexasRN is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texan living in NC
Posts: 4,709
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheConcretekid View Post
I miss the 4,376 US soldiers that died in Iraq... you know that country with no weapons of mass destruction and no ties to terrorism and no links to 9/11. Meanwhile the 2,973 victims of 9/11 (you'll note that this number is about 1.5 times less than the number of soldiers that were sent to their deaths by Bush) are still waiting for justice

I got this article sent to my facebook inbox and thought I'd share it with you. It was written by the guy who co-wrote Lone Survivor with Marcus Luttrell. It explains quite a bit about the WMD situation.

"DID SADDAM HAVE AN ATOM BOMB?

By Patrick Robinson

Did he have an atom bomb? Of course not.
Did he have a nuclear program? Very definitely.

In the broadest commonsense terms, there is only one reason on this earth to produce Uranium-235 – and that’s to make a nuclear weapon. Uranium-235 is the high-tech name for weapons-grade uranium, the principal component of an atomic bomb, or a guided-missile with a nuclear warhead.

Naturally, anyone trying to make a nuclear weapon would prefer to do so in secret. Which is why we are all obliged to listen to a plethora of rubbish about water-reactors and the possible use of uranium 235 in the production of electricity, and other facile excuses.

Essentially you can forget all about that. If anyone is using a ‘gyro’ to ‘spin’ uranium 238 (regular) into uranium 235 – that someone is trying to make a nuclear weapon. It takes around seven years to spin the 238. Which is a long time, fraught with problems.

The finished article, a deliverable weapon with a nuclear warhead, is probably the result of a 10-year program. And so, the question is, not did this character have an atom bomb ? But, did he have a program that would lead to an atom bomb or nuclear missile ?

Which brings us to Saddam Hussein, who was most certainly ‘spinning’ – cunningly placing his six gyros in the enclosed steel rear compartments of massive trucks running up and down the highway, unapproachable, and unseen by outsiders, especially Hans Blix, who was running around in the desert, under strict Iraqi supervision, trying to find an atom bomb on behalf of the United Nations.

The three giant silver colored trucks were nailed by the CIA’s anti-terrorist operators in Iraq. They were photographed by US satellites, pin-pointed and tracked back and forth along Iraq’s very few highways. Colin Powell made a major international presentation of their existence, with photographs, and great detail.

Inside the trucks, he proclaimed, were the totally incriminating gyros, spinning Saddam ever closer to the elusive uranium 235 and the nuclear weapon it would become.

The subsequent accepted mantra that there were no weapons of mass destruction is at best an absurd conclusion at which to arrive. But, much more importantly, a grotesque journey up the wrong path. Because the real question remains, did Saddam have a nuclear program ? Not the rather primitive query, did he have an atom bomb?

At the time, Donald Rumsfeld remarked, in obvious exasperation, What do you want to do ? Leave the sonofabitch there ‘till he has got one?

The truth is, Saddam did acquire uranium-238 from Niger, he did have gyros in those trucks, they were ‘spinning’ throughout their endless journey, and the Iraqis did get that uranium the hell out of the country before anyone found the spinners in the back.

But find them they did. And how do I know ? Because I was privileged to write the life story of one of the US Navy SEALs who discovered them, buried beneath the desert floor, with the obvious signs of the huge spinners having been ripped out and shipped out. The CIA think to Syria.

Try not to forget, the only reason anyone has to ‘spin’ uranium, is to make weapons grade 235, and that’s because they are trying to make an atom bomb or missile.

The word is program, not bomb. Saddam did not have a nuclear bomb. But he did have a very elaborate nuclear program. That’s why he had to go. Because that nuclear program leads only one way – toward the day its owner decides to launch it.

Why else would he have it?"



~Amy
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.