Go Back   Matt-Hughes.com Official Forums > General Discussions > Politics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-02-2010, 07:00 PM
Kyle Lewsader
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

he is at the exact location of latitude: 84.976856467 Longitude:-49.89696596


actually i think they had the chance to catch him but there was some obscene reason why they didnt. Im pretty positive that happened to Sadam Insane as well.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-02-2010, 08:27 PM
Black Mamba
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You are correct Kyle, the US did have a chance to capture Bin Laden. I believe during the Clinton administration we knew the where abouts of Bin Laden. We had people there to get him and yet the powers to be didn't want to do anything. We just let him get away.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-02-2010, 09:39 PM
Robertboxerboy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I agree i think he is in a "safe house" somewhere
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-03-2010, 11:03 AM
atomdanger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bin Laden doesn't matter,
didn't Bush tell you? We got Sadaam instead.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-03-2010, 05:48 PM
rearnakedchoke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

i think he is dead ... of natural causes
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-03-2010, 07:06 PM
donaldbreland
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bush was a better president than that thing we have in office now. Saddam killed more people than Bin Laden did. You better believe that Saddam had something to do with 9-11 as well.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-03-2010, 07:08 PM
donaldbreland
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

[QUOTE]i think he is dead ... of natural causes/QUOTE]

Yeah because our Military couldn't have the intelligence to kill that crooked Muslim S.O.B. I have a question for you rearnaked. Do you practice the Muslim faith.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-03-2010, 07:43 PM
Jonlion's Avatar
Jonlion Jonlion is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London
Posts: 1,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by donaldbreland View Post
Bush was a better president than that thing we have in office now. Saddam killed more people than Bin Laden did. You better believe that Saddam had something to do with 9-11 as well.
Saddam was a despot dictactor.

He would never of had dealings with Islamic terrorist groups such as Al'Quada.

He was a Totalarian, in absolute power and ruled and shared with no one.

I doubt he gave two figs about Osama's cause, only his own power
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-03-2010, 07:45 PM
atomdanger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by donaldbreland View Post
Bush was a better president than that thing we have in office now. Saddam killed more people than Bin Laden did. You better believe that Saddam had something to do with 9-11 as well.
I was unaware the plan after 9 - 11 was to find the middle eastern man who had killed the most people.
Silly me, assuming the plan was to find the people responsible for those attacks.

Maybe we should look in Saudi Arabia, you know, where he is from.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-03-2010, 07:46 PM
atomdanger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonlion View Post
Saddam was a despot dictactor.

He would never of had dealings with Islamic terrorist groups such as Al'Quada.

He was a Totalarian, in absolute power and ruled and shared with no one.

I doubt he gave two figs about Osama's cause, only his own power
That is an interesting point.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.