Go Back   Matt-Hughes.com Official Forums > General Discussions > Politics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-24-2009, 05:33 PM
KENTUCKYREDBONE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Free speech under attack!

PrintBack to story .
Attack on Obama riles Beck's advertisers
By DAVID BAUDER, AP Television Writer David Bauder, Ap Television Writer
Mon Aug 24, 10:18 am ET

NEW YORK Glenn Beck returns to Fox News Channel on Monday after a vacation with fewer companies willing to advertise on his show than when he left, part of the fallout from calling President Barack Obama a racist.

A total of 33 Fox advertisers, including Wal-Mart Stores Inc., CVS Caremark, Clorox and Sprint, directed that their commercials not air on Beck's show, according to the companies and ColorofChange.org, a group that promotes political action among blacks and launched a campaign to get advertisers to abandon him. That's more than a dozen more than were identified a week ago.

While it's unclear what effect, if any, this will ultimately have on Fox and Beck, it is already making advertisers skittish about hawking their wares within the most opinionated cable TV shows.

The Clorox Co., a former Beck advertiser, now says that "we do not want to be associated with inflammatory speech used by either liberal or conservative talk show hosts." The maker of bleach and household cleaners said in a statement that it has decided not to advertise on political talk shows.

The shows present a dilemma for advertisers, who usually like a "safe" environment for their messages. The Olbermanns, Hannitys, O'Reillys, Maddows and Becks of the TV world are more likely to say something that will anger a viewer, who might take it out on sponsors.

They also host the most-watched programs on their networks.

"This is a good illustration of that conundrum," said Rich Hallabran, spokesman for UPS Stores, which he said has temporarily halted buying ads on Fox News Channel as a whole.

Beck can bring the eyeballs. With the health care debate raising political temperatures, his show had its biggest week ever right before his vacation, averaging 2.4 million viewers each day, according to Nielsen Media Research.

He was actually on another Fox show July 28 when he referred to Obama as a racist with "a deep-seated hatred for white people." The network immediately distanced itself from Beck's statement, but Beck didn't. He used his radio show the next day to explain why he believed that. He would not comment for this article, spokesman Matthew Hiltzik said.

ColorofChange.org quickly targeted companies whose ads had appeared during Beck's show, telling them what he had said and seeking a commitment to drop him. The goal is to make Beck a liability, said James Rucker, the organization's executive director.

"They have a toxic asset," Rucker said. "They can either clean it up or get rid of it."

It's not immediately clear how many of the companies actually knew they were advertising on Beck's show. Sometimes commercial time is chosen for a specific show, but often it is bought on a rotation basis, meaning the network sprinkles the ads throughout the day on its own schedule. Sometimes ads appear by mistake; Best Buy said it bought commercial time for earlier in the day, and one of its ads unexpectedly appeared in Beck's show.

One company, CVS Caremark, said it advertises on Fox but hadn't said anything about Beck. Now it has told its advertising agency to inform Fox that it wanted no commercials on Beck.

"We support vigorous debate, especially around policy issues that affect millions of Americans, but we expect it to be informed, inclusive and respectful," said spokeswoman Carolyn Castel.

Besides the unpredictability of the opinionated cable hosts, the rapid pace of today's wired world complicates decisions on where to place ads, said Kathleen Dunleavy, a spokeswoman for Sprint. She said she was surprised at how fast the Beck issue spread across social media outlets and how quickly advertiser names were attached to it.

UPS' Hallabran said the decision to pull commercials "should not be interpreted as we are permanently withdrawing our advertising from Fox." He said the company wants to reach viewers with a wide spectrum of opinions.

Except for UPS Stores, there's no evidence that any advertisers who say they don't want to be on Beck's show are leaving Fox. Network spokeswoman Irena Briganti said the companies have simply requested the ads be moved elsewhere and that Fox hasn't lost any revenue.

She wouldn't say whether Fox was benefiting from any anti-anti-Beck backlash, with companies looking to support him. Some Beck supporters have urged fans to express their displeasure at companies for abandoning their man.

Beck supporters have suggested that retaliation might have something to do with ColorofChange.org's campaign. One of the group's founders, Van Jones, now works in the Obama administration and has been criticized by Beck. But Rucker said Jones has nothing to do with ColorofChange.org now and didn't even know about the campaign before it started.

Beck's strong ratings even at 5 p.m. EDT he often outdraws whatever CNN and MSNBC show in prime-time make it unlikely Beck is going anywhere even as the list of advertisers avoiding him approaches three dozen.

But it could mean advertising time becomes cheaper on his show than such a large audience would normally command. Some of his show's advertisers last week included a male enhancement pill, a law firm looking to sue on behalf of asbestos victims, a company selling medical supplies to diabetics and a water filter company.

Rucker said ColorofChange.org has contacted about 60 companies regarding Beck, and is heartened by the response.

"It's causing a certain conversation around Beck, which I think is important," he said.

___

On the Net:

http://www.colorofchange.org

http://www.foxnews.com

___

EDITOR'S NOTE David Bauder can be reached at dbauder"at"ap.org

Copyright 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.Questions
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-24-2009, 05:48 PM
que
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

good. glen beck needs to act less like rush limbach and more like a professional if he wants his sponsors and viewers to take him seriously
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-24-2009, 06:10 PM
rearnakedchoke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

you say stupid things and you have to pay the consequences .. no one is saying he can't say stupid things, they are just saying continue to say garbage and you will lose sponsors ... like when the dixie chicks opened their mouth and said something like they were ashamed of GWB being from texas and the iraq war was wrong ... they got hammered, issued apologies and took them a while to get back their fans and i still don't know if they got them all back .. no one said you can't say bad things, but they said it and paid the consequences ...people should think the next time they think they are saying something cool ...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-25-2009, 07:56 PM
KENTUCKYREDBONE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

One of the things about this that bothers me is that the Folk's behind this boycott seem to be connected to the Whitehouse! As for the unprofessional thing,well he does bring in ratings and seems to believe what he says! Then this group didn't have problems when some nut job accused Bush of causing hurricane Katrina because he hated Black's. To the best of my Knowledge nobody in the Bush administration attacked his critic's the way Folks in the Obama administration have been attacking his critics. On a side note from what I have been reading the boycott really ain't working that well!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-25-2009, 09:25 PM
Buzzard
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KENTUCKYREDBONE
One of the things about this that bothers me is that the Folk's behind this boycott seem to be connected to the Whitehouse! As for the unprofessional thing,well he does bring in ratings and seems to believe what he says! Then this group didn't have problems when some nut job accused Bush of causing hurricane Katrina because he hated Black's. To the best of my Knowledge nobody in the Bush administration attacked his critic's the way Folks in the Obama administration have been attacking his critics. On a side note from what I have been reading the boycott really ain't working that well!

I sure didn't see where free speech was under attack. I guess if you say it enough, some people will believe it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-25-2009, 09:42 PM
Crisco
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buzzard
I sure didn't see where free speech was under attack. I guess if you say it enough, some people will believe it.
Agreed. It's more capitalism at work then anything.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-26-2009, 03:57 AM
Buzzard
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crisco
Agreed. It's more capitalism at work then anything.
See, you and I can agree on things.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-26-2009, 11:08 AM
County Mike
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
The Clorox Co., a former Beck advertiser, now says that "we do not want to be associated with inflammatory speech used by either liberal or conservative talk show hosts." The maker of bleach and household cleaners said in a statement that it has decided not to advertise on political talk shows.
I thought Clorox was all about making everything white.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-26-2009, 12:24 PM
rockdawg21's Avatar
rockdawg21 rockdawg21 is offline
I'm kind of a big deal
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 5,584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by County Mike
I thought Clorox was all about making everything white.
Oh the irony!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-26-2009, 09:45 PM
KENTUCKYREDBONE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buzzard
I sure didn't see where free speech was under attack. I guess if you say it enough, some people will believe it.
If it's just some regular Folk's that's one thing! But if like I think the group behind it is connected to the White house then its another! Guess you missed that!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.