Go Back   Matt-Hughes.com Official Forums > MMA Related > MMA

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 07-30-2009, 06:01 AM
Hughes_GOAT
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by atomdanger
He isn't fighting this test right now.
WHY NOT?
yes he is. he said he's appealing it.
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 07-30-2009, 06:02 AM
atomdanger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hughes_GOAT
or why go after Sherk, Franca, Bonnar, Sylvia, Gracie etc. fact is labs made mistakes in the past, false positives etc, which is why CSAC switched to WADA. Barnett didn't fail WADA in 2002, in fact it cleared him. Sherk failed WADA and that's why he's guilty. Barnett failed WADA this time so i believe he's guilty and have said as much. but not guilty in 2002.
Again.
An even better point you should think about,
is that if it is a conspiracy, why wouldn't they just have Fedor test dirty?
when he fought here for Pride, and for Affliction?

Fedor's name would be ruined and nobody would want him int he UFC,
problem solved.

Or when Randy walked out on his contract?
Why not have him random tested and come up positive?
Or when BJ walked out?

Or any time other fighters have bad mouthed and held out for more money,
why not Tito?

Or why not AA? They really wanted to re sign him, and he was on a 3 fight win streak,
it would have been great if he had tested positive.

Why are they out for poor Josh barnett's head only?

Also, if you think he is guilty this time,
why do you care if he wasn't in 2002?
WADA is an agency,
they don't have magical tests that other labs do not.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 07-30-2009, 06:02 AM
atomdanger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hughes_GOAT
yes he is. he said he's appealing it.
Then I suppose we shall see.

Source?
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 07-30-2009, 06:04 AM
atomdanger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On a positive note (pun intended), thanks for the good argument.

I haven't gotten into a multiple pager in a while!

I will truly admit I was wrong and apologize if Barnett proves innocent.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 07-30-2009, 06:11 AM
Hughes_GOAT
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

i never said it was a conspiracy, that's on you. i said labs in the past, before WADA, would have false positives. i answered the rest of your post on the other fighters in my last reply. you're just repeating yourself. i care as much about his 2002 innocence as you care about saying he's guilty. and WADA is infalible with their testing. they have fail safes at every level, which is why Sherk couldn't buy his innocence.
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 07-30-2009, 06:11 AM
Hughes_GOAT
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by atomdanger
Then I suppose we shall see.

Source?
it was on Sherdog 3 days ago.
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 07-30-2009, 06:14 AM
Hughes_GOAT
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by atomdanger
On a positive note (pun intended), thanks for the good argument.

I haven't gotten into a multiple pager in a while!

I will truly admit I was wrong and apologize if Barnett proves innocent.
about his 2002 or now? he was innocent in 2002 but not now, i don't think?
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 07-30-2009, 06:34 AM
Hughes_GOAT
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by atomdanger
Then I suppose we shall see.

Source?
it's on Sherdog right now.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.