Speaker of the house thinks less babies is a great stimulus package.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/D...aspx?id=398956

How sick can you be. Lets have less babies and give more money to the poor so they can abort their kids and that will make the economy better. Outrage!

[NateR]

Yeah, this kind of thing is sickening. So, now I guess Nancy Pulosi has decided that children are an unnecessary economic burden that must be eliminated. What a sick, morally-reprehensible human being she is.

Originally Posted by Chris F

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/D...aspx?id=398956

How sick can you be. Lets have less babies and give more money to the poor so they can abort their kids and that will make the economy better. Outrage!

I think we would have a lot more money if we had less Nancy Pelosis around. If only there was an abortion for that. We're getting closer and closer to the government controlled family that China enjoys so much.

Originally Posted by Josh

I think we would have a lot more money if we had less Nancy Pelosis around. If only there was an abortion for that. We're getting closer and closer to the government controlled family that China enjoys so much.

Sad but true. Socialism will destroy us even more. Obama wants to bail everyone out so they gov can own it all. Go check out all his plans on the white house page. His plans look more Marxist then anyhting i have seen in years.

I didn't read the article but I'm all for the poor having fewer babies.

If you can't afford to take care of them without government assistance, then don't have babies. Use birth control. I'm tired of paying for other people's babies.

Yeah well, your tax dollars are also paying for abortions. Medicaid covers it. I was FURIOUS when I discovered that.

Originally Posted by County Mike

I didn't read the article but I'm all for the poor having fewer babies.

If you can't afford to take care of them without government assistance, then don't have babies. Use birth control. I'm tired of paying for other people's babies.

Originally Posted by Primadawn

Yeah well, your tax dollars are also paying for abortions. Medicaid covers it. I was FURIOUS when I discovered that.

I don't think what Mike was getting at is that abortions are birth control, unfortunately some people do think that way....but I'm willing to bet that's not Mike's stance....that might not have ben your take on it, but the 'Yeah well' that you started your comments with lead me to believe that you were debating his comments.

I agree with Mike though. There are very few things that bother me more than seeing a family that can't afford the children that they have. It's a touchy subject, obviously, because one can always argue the fact that these children are conceived out of love.....and that may be the case, but there's got to be common sense involved as well. It's a simple math problem, if you're having problems raising the five children that you have, don't have a sixth......it's that simple.

I didn't read the article, because I really don't care what Nancy Pelosi has to say on the issue, but I think that people with limited incomes should really consider the consequences of bringing another child into the world.

Later.

Well said Bill.

I saw a bumper sticker that said:
"Pro Choice BEFORE Conception,
Pro Life AFTER."

For most situations, I agree with that. If you don't want a baby, use a condom, BC pill, etc. Don't think of abortion as a way to undo your bad decision.

No, I wasn't debating Mike. Disregard my "yeah well"...

Or not--maybe I'll start all my posts with "Yeah well". YES! It will be my "thing"!

Originally Posted by Primadawn

No, I wasn't debating Mike. Disregard my "yeah well"...

Or not--maybe I'll start all my posts with "Yeah well". YES! It will be my "thing"!

Good. Maybe if you have your own thing you'll stop asking to see my thing.