Children! From Charlie Daniels soapbox!

[NateR]

Originally Posted by Spiritwalker

So you understand why I have issues with the different individual belifes in what God said then, correct?

You need to be more specific. Exactly which "different individual beliefs" are you talking about?

Originally Posted by Mark

You want two guys holding hands and acting in love at your church? Practicing gays have no buisness at church in my opinion. I think church is mostly for the believers.

Nope! That falls under not behaving and causing trouble!

[Neezar]

Originally Posted by Neezar

SpiritWalker, this is NOT about what Nate believes is right or wrong. And believe it or not it isn't about what you believe the definition of these two groups are either. GO to NAMBLA's website and read some of their arguments. If you are familiar enough with the gay rights movement and their arguments then you will recognize the arguments. If not take a peek at one of the gay advocate sites. It is shocking how NAMBLA is trying to ride right on the coattails of the gay rights movement. The man-on-man is only half their battle. And they are waiting on the gays to conquer that for them. The other half, the age, is only a recent obsticle. Your parent's generation had kids marrying old coggers as a common practice.

So this isn't about what you believe. It is what they are doing.

Originally Posted by CAVEMAN

I just have to add my 2 cents here. I read a couple of posts where someone was arguing that pedophiles and homosexuality is not the same. That is wrong and it is a lie from the pit of hell. It is all sexual perversion and they all are perverts.

Social (and the resulting legal) attitudes toward the appropriate age of consent have drifted upwards in modern times. For example, while ages from 10 to 13 were typically acceptable in western countries during the mid-19th century,[1] 15 to 18 had become the norm in many countries by the end of the 20th century.[2] However, gay rights activist Peter Tatchell in Great Britain and bioethicist Jacob Appel have argued in favor of reducing the age of consent in their respective countries.[3] Appel has argued that "pro-sex is pro-safety" and that "statutes criminalizing [teenage sex] are far more likely to harm teenagers than to help them -- whether by denying them access to necessary information, deterring them from sharing their experiences with teachers and counselors for fear that they or their partners will be reported to authorities, or driving them to have sex in parked cars and dark alleys rather than safe, warm bedrooms."[4]

As I said earlier, the pedophiles are using the gay rights activists to further their cause.

[VCURamFan]

Originally Posted by Neezar

As I said earlier, the pedophiles are using the gay rights activists to further their cause.

Denise, are you trying to imply that you're smart & are able to discern truth??????

[Neezar]

Originally Posted by VCURamFan

Denise, are you trying to imply that you're smart & are able to discern truth??????

Well, I wouldn't go that far...

[VCURamFan]

Originally Posted by Neezar

Well, I wouldn't go that far...

O, ok. I was gonna have to call shenanigans!!

[Neezar]

Originally Posted by VCURamFan

O, ok. I was gonna have to call shenanigans!!

Hey Now!

[VCURamFan]

Originally Posted by Neezar

Hey Now!

Do I lie?

[Neezar]

Originally Posted by VCURamFan

Do I lie?

I can't be upset with you right now. I am still dazzled by your brillance in the Robbie thread.

[VCURamFan]

Originally Posted by Neezar

I can't be upset with you right now. I am still dazzled by your brillance in the Robbie thread.

I know, I'm trying to make the most of it!