Chuck and Tito next TUF coaches.....

Originally Posted by flo

What's most shocking to me is the reference to Gladys Kravitz.

Yeah me too. The nerve of someone trying to insult her character. I mean I heard she was a reliable source from my mailman's parole officer's daughters best friend.

[Llamafighter]

Originally Posted by flo

What's most shocking to me is the reference to Gladys Kravitz.

Originally Posted by Josh

Yeah me too. The nerve of someone trying to insult her character. I mean I heard she was a reliable source from my mailman's parole officer's daughters best friend.

Well, back to the topic at hand, if I may. They're both good coaches, in fact seeing Tito coach turned me from a hater into a lukewarm, indifferent fan of his. However, that's also how I view a third Chuck/Tito fight...no desire to see it, won't be buying the PPV.

[Spiritwalker]

Originally Posted by wavetar

Well, back to the topic at hand, if I may. They're both good coaches, in fact seeing Tito coach turned me from a hater into a lukewarm, indifferent fan of his. However, that's also how I view a third Chuck/Tito fight...no desire to see it, won't be buying the PPV.

I will be buying it just to see Chuck fight.. who cares who he's fighting.. Unless he was fighting Baby Jay... I would pay double to see that...

Originally Posted by Spiritwalker

I will be buying it just to see Chuck fight.. who cares who he's fighting.. Unless he was fighting Baby Jay... I would pay double to see that...

I like Liddell & all, but he's 1-4 since 2007...and his last truly dominant fight was against Sobral in 2006. I wouldn't mind seeing him make a comeback of sorts and beat a good opponent...but against Tito even if he wins, I'll basically think "So what...he's beaten him twice before and Tito is a shadow of his former self too". So, it really won't mean anything to me.

It would be better if they left him out of coaching & gave him a fight against an up & comer like Jon Jones. Now that I would pay to see.

[Spiritwalker]

Originally Posted by wavetar

I like Liddell & all, but he's 1-4 since 2007...and his last truly dominant fight was against Sobral in 2006. I wouldn't mind seeing him make a comeback of sorts and beat a good opponent...but against Tito even if he wins, I'll basically think "So what...he's beaten him twice before and Tito is a shadow of his former self too". So, it really won't mean anything to me.

It would be better if they left him out of coaching & gave him a fight against an up & comer like Jon Jones. Now that I would pay to see.

Just because he didn't "dominate" Jardine.. didn't mean it wasn't a great fight.. and even seeing Chuck lose.. (which I hate almost as much as seeing Matt lose) It's great to watch him fight.

I want Chuck/Forrest.. Jon Jones is good and all.. but not "there" yet...

Originally Posted by Spiritwalker

Just because he didn't "dominate" Jardine.. didn't mean it wasn't a great fight...

Think about what you just said...Liddell didn't dominate Jardine. Would that have even rolled off your tongue a few years ago? Sure it was an entertaining fight...but Chuck would've chewed him up & spit him out within a round (like every current top ten 205 contender does) pre-2007. I personally don't like watching once-great fighters get beat by journeymen...it's just sad.

Time for the UFC to establish an over-40 division...or in the case of Tito, a 'Shamrock' division, 'cause that's the only guy he can seem to beat.