Go Back   Matt-Hughes.com Official Forums > MMA Related > UFC

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-17-2009, 12:00 AM
Irish Pride's Avatar
Irish Pride Irish Pride is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 621
Default Rampage Question

I got a question about Rampage and the fight he was supposed to have with Rashad.

I don't know the logistics of it which is what spawned the question. In the contract itself, is there always a clause that says fighters can back out of a fight for other reasons besides injuries?

Had Rampage not signed a fight contract to fight Rashad? It seemed like it was already set in stone.

I would think the fighters first responsibility would be to fight, so I'm curious how Rampage was able to back out of a fight already set up, due to acting.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-17-2009, 12:28 AM
logrus
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irish Pride View Post
I got a question about Rampage and the fight he was supposed to have with Rashad.

I don't know the logistics of it which is what spawned the question. In the contract itself, is there always a clause that says fighters can back out of a fight for other reasons besides injuries?

Had Rampage not signed a fight contract to fight Rashad? It seemed like it was already set in stone.

I would think the fighters first responsibility would be to fight, so I'm curious how Rampage was able to back out of a fight already set up, due to acting.
Depends what is stated in the contract. Also some fighters have more pull then other fighters so they could get away with more then others.

From what I heard it was because Rampage is playing Mr T for the A-Team remake, and the shooting he signed for was probably prior to his signing with Evan.

Another thing you have to remember is this is another free market ploy for the UFC. Which is a no brainer if your looking for free press and marketing.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-17-2009, 03:37 AM
VCURamFan's Avatar
VCURamFan VCURamFan is offline
Waiting for June 6th
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Basketball Capital of the World
Posts: 14,334
Default

What I remember reading about the situation was that Rampage "talked to Dana & Dana let him do it". I dunno how truthful/accurate/helpful that is, but it's what I remember.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-17-2009, 09:15 PM
atomdanger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irish Pride View Post
I got a question about Rampage and the fight he was supposed to have with Rashad.

I don't know the logistics of it which is what spawned the question. In the contract itself, is there always a clause that says fighters can back out of a fight for other reasons besides injuries?

Had Rampage not signed a fight contract to fight Rashad? It seemed like it was already set in stone.

I would think the fighters first responsibility would be to fight, so I'm curious how Rampage was able to back out of a fight already set up, due to acting.

well realistically what can they do about it?
Fire him?
Not going to happen.

Sue him? come on....

So basically when you have a high profile fighter,
they sort of do what they want. BJ is a good example, choosing his fight dates and setting demands....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-18-2009, 03:12 AM
Maldonado136
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

rashad cant complain too much because he turned down the rampage fight when he had the belt. when rampage fought jardine it was originally going to be against rashad.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-18-2009, 06:22 AM
que
Guest
 
Posts: n/a