![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do you ever wonder why the countries directly surrounded by Iran and Iraq and have the most to lose or gain by regime change never step up? The people within Iran who want change are the ones who need to make it happen, and yes, with their blood and even death. Our forefathers did it here and our brave men and women continue to do it over there in Iraq and Afghanistan. I'm all for helping those in need, but I don't think we need to commit our already over-extended military to yet another country's internal conflict. We need to start taking care of our own country and our people, our men and women coming back facing terrible life-changing mental and physical ordeals for the rest of their lives.
They said earlier on tv that they are going ahead with swearing in whats-his-name (sorry, that's what I'm calling him or just Am'jad) as the official winner of the election. Hopefully, the people will continue to protest and flood the streets and continue to get video out to the rest of the world as to what's happening so this government can't hide it's corrupt and evil ways. |
|
#42
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The United States HAS definately used this tactic before in the past. They have supported uprisings, and they have also sponcered assassination attempts particularly if the leaders of the country they have issues with are Communist. The British Government wouldnt say no to taking part in such a stealth opporation either. I dont think we are quite as well trained, so we probably would only take part if it were a joint international mission. ...one thing we can say for sure. It dont involve the French
__________________
![]() |
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Direct Military action is out of the question...but a covert opporation would go down a treat
__________________
![]() |
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
I thought you were implying that the US should take this opportunity to intervene. And I was thinking of your stance on our foreign affairs right now. Just having a hard time jiving the two. |
|
#45
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I think they should sneak in and topple the government from inside. I think they should go in undercover, arm, and encourage the Demonstrators...I think they should support and quietly try and protect them...then when the time is right, watch the protestors make their coup and be ready to stand behind them when they do to ensure their success. That doesnt break any United Nations Sanctions...because there is no law governing something that is not supposed to happen period. Technically, there is no direct law saying that friends cant help each other out. The United States would simply be helping the democratic majority. They could go as far as saying they were actually helping the TRUE government of Iran. But of course...they simply deny all knowledge if things go wrong. No Proof, no exposure. I'm all for State Sponcered Covert Opporations. Its clean, its effective, there are moral justifications. Its not IN the law...so its not exactly against the law...and...if the spys get caught...well...pretend it wasnt you
__________________
![]() |
|
#46
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think only Republicans do things like that. |
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
England was once a republic...for Seven short years
__________________
![]() |
|
#48
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Also, if it was some random small group who targeted her for one reason or another, that would still be a political ploy. Personally, I just think they shot her because she was in their sights, and probably because she is a woman. Either way, that video was nuts. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|