Go Back   Matt-Hughes.com Official Forums > MMA Related > Matt Hughes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 03-12-2009, 02:40 PM
Neezar's Avatar
Neezar Neezar is offline
SupaDupaMod
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: South
Posts: 6,490
Send a message via Yahoo to Neezar
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NateR
This is quickly spinning out of control. To be absolutely clear: While Matt may have considered a move to middleweight in the past, he currently has absolutely zero plans to change weight classes. People are reading too much into Matt's comments and getting ahead of themselves here. Right now, Matt's focus is 100% on Matt Serra.
When have we ever needed truth or probability behind our debates? That is clearly not a requirement around here.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 03-12-2009, 02:48 PM
Crisco
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neezar
When have we ever needed truth or probability behind our debates? That is clearly not a requirement around here.
QFT...


Facts pfft
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 03-12-2009, 02:57 PM
Llamafighter's Avatar
Llamafighter Llamafighter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Astoria, New York
Posts: 4,982
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neezar
When have we ever needed truth or probability behind our debates? That is clearly not a requirement around here.
What are you talking about?! All our debates are based on fact!!!

see I'm doing it again;)
__________________
"Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear - not absence of fear."
-Mark Twain

[
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 03-12-2009, 03:28 PM
MattHughesRocks's Avatar
MattHughesRocks MattHughesRocks is offline
Stump Rules!
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: So Cal
Posts: 9,794
Default

No kidding! Nathan quit raining on our parade! We're trying to come up with some good fights here


Quote:
Originally Posted by Neezar
When have we ever needed truth or probability behind our debates? That is clearly not a requirement around here.
__________________


http://stumpdotcom.com/
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 03-12-2009, 06:49 PM
atomdanger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neezar
When have we ever needed truth or probability behind our debates? That is clearly not a requirement around here.

WTF
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 03-12-2009, 08:44 PM
rockdawg21's Avatar
rockdawg21 rockdawg21 is offline
I'm kind of a big deal
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 5,584
Default

Perhaps it's time we just ban NateR from this thread. We're trying to have fun debating this idea, but you keep ruining it!

Ok, rant over, WAR HUGHES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.