Go Back   Matt-Hughes.com Official Forums > General Discussions > Sports

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-17-2012, 11:49 PM
J.B.'s Avatar
J.B. J.B. is offline
WAR CARDINALS!
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Apache Juntion, AZ
Posts: 8,462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockdawg21 View Post
LOL, Floyd made himself into the bad boy image and it's done well for him financially, but it does create other problems; of course, some of the stuff he does, it's like he's either dumb, bored, having fun, or REALLY trying to portray the bad boy image, who knows?

As for Filipinos, there are a lot of them who are jealous of Pac's success. To me, it's really funny that he is the richest person in the Filipino Congress considering he's just a boxer.

In the case of both guys, like Biggie, P. Diddy, and Ma$e say...Mo' Money, Mo' Problems.
The "bad guy image" is one thing, but that doesn't mean reporters like Martin Rogers or Michael Marley should write hit pieces that are misleading and often leave details out. Sure, Floyd doesn't mind wearing the black hat, and it has been one of the primary reasons for his popularity since making the transition from "Pretty Boy" to "Money". However, there is a difference between stating an opinion and blatantly misleading readers or listeners when you are representing a "news" organization.

Now, you will probably hate me for saying this, but I'm gonna say it and then I will explain why it's true.... Manny Pacquiao is only as popular as he is in America because of Floyd Mayweather.

Having Floyd around, and all the talk about them fighting, has made it easy for casual fans to blindly embrace Manny simply out of disdain for Mayweather. It's also made it easy for hot-dog media guys to prop Manny up simply by continuing to feed the masses the anti-Floyd nonsense that they love so much. Of course, it goes both ways and Floyd has benefited from Manny too, but not nearly as much as Manny has gained from having Floyd. Even before the fight with De La Hoya, Floyd was making a name for himself and people were taking notice. That bad-guy image is what gets people's attention, just ask Chael Sonnen. If Floyd never had Manny, it would have probably just been another guy that filled Pac's place as "the guy people want to see beat Floyd". Even if nobody actually filled that role, Floyd would still be a popular figure just because of how polarizing he is as an individual and because of how uniquely talented he is as a boxer. There is also that giant goose-egg in his loss column, and even though hardcore boxing fans are more analytical when it comes to records, a lot of casual fans hold that in high regard. To this day people still talk about Rocky Marciano for that very reason.

Now, I'm not trying to take anything away from Pacquiao's accomplishments as a boxer, not at all. Manny is definitely one of the all time greats. However, I don't think he would have nearly as many fans in America as he does today without this saga with Mayweather. Keep in mind, I'm only saying here in America. I realize how popular he is in the Philippines, but I don't think what he's done over the last 3-5 years would have resonated with American fans as much if there wasn't a Floyd Mayweather, or more importantly any American in general, out there being "the bad guy" who has never lost a fight.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-18-2012, 10:28 PM
JavierDLC's Avatar
JavierDLC JavierDLC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: El Paso Texas
Posts: 2,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J.B. View Post
The "bad guy image" is one thing, but that doesn't mean reporters like Martin Rogers or Michael Marley should write hit pieces that are misleading and often leave details out. Sure, Floyd doesn't mind wearing the black hat, and it has been one of the primary reasons for his popularity since making the transition from "Pretty Boy" to "Money". However, there is a difference between stating an opinion and blatantly misleading readers or listeners when you are representing a "news" organization.

Now, you will probably hate me for saying this, but I'm gonna say it and then I will explain why it's true.... Manny Pacquiao is only as popular as he is in America because of Floyd Mayweather.

Having Floyd around, and all the talk about them fighting, has made it easy for casual fans to blindly embrace Manny simply out of disdain for Mayweather. It's also made it easy for hot-dog media guys to prop Manny up simply by continuing to feed the masses the anti-Floyd nonsense that they love so much. Of course, it goes both ways and Floyd has benefited from Manny too, but not nearly as much as Manny has gained from having Floyd. Even before the fight with De La Hoya, Floyd was making a name for himself and people were taking notice. That bad-guy image is what gets people's attention, just ask Chael Sonnen. If Floyd never had Manny, it would have probably just been another guy that filled Pac's place as "the guy people want to see beat Floyd". Even if nobody actually filled that role, Floyd would still be a popular figure just because of how polarizing he is as an individual and because of how uniquely talented he is as a boxer. There is also that giant goose-egg in his loss column, and even though hardcore boxing fans are more analytical when it comes to records, a lot of casual fans hold that in high regard. To this day people still talk about Rocky Marciano for that very reason.

Now, I'm not trying to take anything away from Pacquiao's accomplishments as a boxer, not at all. Manny is definitely one of the all time greats. However, I don't think he would have nearly as many fans in America as he does today without this saga with Mayweather. Keep in mind, I'm only saying here in America. I realize how popular he is in the Philippines, but I don't think what he's done over the last 3-5 years would have resonated with American fans as much if there wasn't a Floyd Mayweather, or more importantly any American in general, out there being "the bad guy" who has never lost a fight.


I sponsor this message!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-19-2012, 05:27 AM
rockdawg21's Avatar
rockdawg21 rockdawg21 is offline
I'm kind of a big deal
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 5,584
Default

No it all makes sense. Both guys experienced a huge surge in popularity thanks to each persons' fight with DLH, a passing of the torch if you will. Mayweather was benefiting from his arguments with Merchant and Manny for his wars with the great Mexican fighters of this era. It was good they both fought DLH and had their much deserved rise.

But, just like Mayweather, Pacquiao was also making a name for himself prior to fighting DLH as his 2nd fight with Marquez broke a record for the highest PPV buys at a weight lower than welterweight at 400,000 (it has since been surpassed as his junior welterweight fight with Hatton garnered 850,000, but that was after he fought DLH). Mayweather's highest total prior to fighting DLH was 375,000 against Judah @ WW. Both guys had pretty comparable numbers prior to the DLH fight and are about equal today with the big exception being the record-breaking sale of the DLH bout with Floyd (surprisingly, Pac's last 3 fights have a higher total than Mayweather's last 3 fights 3,900,000 to 3,700,000 and they have 2 of the same fighters in Marquez and Mosley, so Pac's stock is rising).

You might like this, I actually did a calculation of PPV averages for both fighters prior to the DLH fight and after the DLH fight to see what would be a fair split for the fight. Mayweather's average is a little higher and when you do a total of both fighters' averages, then cross multiply and divide each fighter, you get Mayweather with 55% and Pacquiao with 45%. That should actually be their purse split if they want to fight, 70/30 is pretty outrageous. This calculation only shows the fights with DLH and after for each fighter, but it isn't much different (I think 57/43) when you include their fights prior to DLH in the averages. Anyways, here's the Excel spreadsheet, just unzip it:

www.matt-hughes.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=256&stc=1&d=1332136392

Both guys feed great off each other, it's good for the sport. Kinda like how Ali needed Frazier and vice versa; but these guys are really running out of options after these next set of fights, so I just hope us fans are able to get what we want and deserve.
Attached Files
File Type: zip Mayweather vs Pacquiao PPV number analysis.zip (4.7 KB, 1 views)
__________________

Last edited by rockdawg21; 03-19-2012 at 05:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-19-2012, 06:05 AM
rockdawg21's Avatar
rockdawg21 rockdawg21 is offline
I'm kind of a big deal
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 5,584
Default

Oh, and there was a pro-Mayweather Filipina (how that is, I don't know ) on the Philboxing.com forum who suggested checking against their common opponents, which is a good idea. Here are her calculations:

Quote:
70-30, an obvious negotiation tactic, seems to be reasonable afterall.

lets see their numbers on their common opponents: delahoya, hatton, mosley, marquez

5770000 for mayweather
4850000 for pacquiao

thats 45.67% for pacquiao
and 54.33% for mayweather
So, that's still 55/45 in favor of Mayweather. I won't argue that, but I still argue that 70/30 is unreasonable.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-19-2012, 09:10 AM
J.B.'s Avatar
J.B. J.B. is offline
WAR CARDINALS!
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Apache Juntion, AZ
Posts: 8,462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockdawg21 View Post
No it all makes sense. Both guys experienced a huge surge in popularity thanks to each persons' fight with DLH, a passing of the torch if you will. Mayweather was benefiting from his arguments with Merchant and Manny for his wars with the great Mexican fighters of this era. It was good they both fought DLH and had their much deserved rise.

But, just like Mayweather, Pacquiao was also making a name for himself prior to fighting DLH as his 2nd fight with Marquez broke a record for the highest PPV buys at a weight lower than welterweight at 400,000 (it has since been surpassed as his junior welterweight fight with Hatton garnered 850,000, but that was after he fought DLH). Mayweather's highest total prior to fighting DLH was 375,000 against Judah @ WW. Both guys had pretty comparable numbers prior to the DLH fight and are about equal today with the big exception being the record-breaking sale of the DLH bout with Floyd (surprisingly, Pac's last 3 fights have a higher total than Mayweather's last 3 fights 3,900,000 to 3,700,000 and they have 2 of the same fighters in Marquez and Mosley, so Pac's stock is rising).

You might like this, I actually did a calculation of PPV averages for both fighters prior to the DLH fight and after the DLH fight to see what would be a fair split for the fight. Mayweather's average is a little higher and when you do a total of both fighters' averages, then cross multiply and divide each fighter, you get Mayweather with 55% and Pacquiao with 45%. That should actually be their purse split if they want to fight, 70/30 is pretty outrageous. This calculation only shows the fights with DLH and after for each fighter, but it isn't much different (I think 57/43) when you include their fights prior to DLH in the averages. Anyways, here's the Excel spreadsheet, just unzip it:

www.matt-hughes.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=256&stc=1&d=1332136392

Both guys feed great off each other, it's good for the sport. Kinda like how Ali needed Frazier and vice versa; but these guys are really running out of options after these next set of fights, so I just hope us fans are able to get what we want and deserve.
I love your last part about Ali/Frazier, but please brother, don't make this a baseball type of argument where all we talk about is numbers. I appreciate what you are saying, and it is relevant in terms of PPV sales, but it doesn't really entirely speak to my point about Pacquiao's popularity in America just because of Floyd's existence. Actually, you make my point for me when you even mention Ali/Frazier. Nobody would know who Smokin Joe was if it wasn't for Muhammad Ali.

You are throwing 70/30 around because of various reports, and also trying to compare similar opponents PPV numbers, but you fail to mention some of the other parts of boxing...such as; how you actually looked in your last few fights...or what your record looks like. Let's face it. Pacquiao hasn't looked that hot in his last few fights, and when people jumped on his bandwagon it was only because he was beating people Floyd already beat.

Even if the number Floyd threw out WAS 70/30, it would still be more money than Pac has ever made with Arum, and more money than he will ever make fighting anybody else ever! I actually wish for a 50/50 split, just so this fight MAY happen...but let's not act like it's crazy to say Floyd deserves more. Heck, you even said that yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-19-2012, 12:38 PM
rockdawg21's Avatar
rockdawg21 rockdawg21 is offline
I'm kind of a big deal
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 5,584
Default

LOL, ok, well if that's what you believe then that's what you believe. Both guys can attribute their rapid rise in star power thanks to DLH. I attribute more of Pac's increase in star power to DLH and his fight with Cotto rather than the talk with Floyd and people began following Pac simply because he's extremely exciting to watch; that's what drew me in the first time I saw him fight (against Ledwaba). Is the talk about him matching with Floyd relevant to Pac's success? Yes, but if it weren't about Floyd, it'd be somebody else (just as you said if it weren't for Floyd, it'd be somebody else other than Pac trying to chase him), it is reciprocal.

And no, based on