![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Lol.. Really did you see Bisping n Sonnen? Didn't Sonnen pick apart Stann if I recall? Bisping>Stann Sonnen=Bisping Sonnen>Stann
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
AND Sonnen = Bisping THEN Bisping > Stann However, I disagree with the second premise (Sorry Foxy, don't kill me): IF Sonnen > Stann AND Sonnen > Bisping THEN Bisping ? Stann Chael beat both of them, but beat them in different manners, therefore there's no real way to compare them. I think they're about 2 of the most evenly matched fighters in the MW division right now.
__________________
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I need you around to read your posts! lol. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'd love to see this fight. That is all.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
dumb fight for bisping .. stann not even on his level .. stann is overrated, don't know why, but he can't hang with these guys ..
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think every fight is different. It has more to do with coaching and training etc etc. By your logic Matt Serra is better than most of the WW division because he beat GSP once. Every fight is different. Bipsping could easily show up and tear Stann to sherds. In my personal opinion I think Stann can keep it on his feet and use angles to avoid Bipsping kickboxing. And simply out point him.
__________________
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
something we can really agree on.
__________________
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|