Go Back   Matt-Hughes.com Official Forums > General Discussions > The Woodshed

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-14-2011, 04:02 PM
rearnakedchoke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NateR View Post
If either of them were to accept Christ, abandon their lesbian lifestyle, enter into a true marriage (read: a heterosexual marriage), then gets pregnant with her husband's child, I would have trouble denying either of them the right to be a mother of her own biological child.

BTW, I've asked adamt to remove his sig image. That's just too close to pornographic for this website.
what if they were to convert to another religion .. do you still think they should have kids?? lol .. i know you don't think only Christian's should be able to procreate .. just wondering ..
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-14-2011, 04:07 PM
NateR's Avatar
NateR NateR is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rearnakedchoke View Post
what if they were to convert to another religion .. do you still think they should have kids?? lol .. i know you don't think only Christian's should be able to procreate .. just wondering ..
I don't believe they would have the strength to abandon the lesbian lifestyle without accepting Christ.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-14-2011, 04:52 PM
rearnakedchoke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NateR View Post
I don't believe they would have the strength to abandon the lesbian lifestyle without accepting Christ.
true .. gotcha!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-15-2011, 06:40 PM
Tyburn's Avatar
Tyburn Tyburn is offline
Angry @ Injustice!
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: England
Posts: 16,838
Default

there is plenty of militancy in here I see...reading this thread...I started singing... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPsL2WVhFCc
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-15-2011, 07:03 PM
NateR's Avatar
NateR NateR is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyburn View Post
there is plenty of militancy in here I see...reading this thread...I started singing... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPsL2WVhFCc
Militancy? Exactly what part of this thread would you consider militant?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-15-2011, 09:48 PM
Tyburn's Avatar
Tyburn Tyburn is offline
Angry @ Injustice!
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: England
Posts: 16,838
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NateR View Post
Militancy? Exactly what part of this thread would you consider militant?
it could have been worse... I could have been singing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_A7Hu0uKNw

I dont want to come across as a meanie towards you or anyone Nathan but Its the general cycle on this forum...mention anything to do with homosexuality at all, and out come all the patrons who tut, shake their heads, and generally just get angry.

That to me is a nigh on militant response...somehow...this thread has nothing really to do with child abuse...and lots, as always to do with squash the homos....its like a nasty bandwagon that invades, at the heart of it, its always the morality of gays... say the word "gay" and its like poking a stick into a wasps nest...out they all come, buzzing and spluttering, and all aggreeing on how terrible the situation is blah, blah, blah. posting their emoticons, waving their sticks. Waging their fingers and shaking their heads

Mike had it right. He wanted to know more about the context before screaming condemnation and burrying every single visitor to this thread in hot coals
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-15-2011, 11:41 PM
bradwright
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyburn View Post
it could have been worse... I could have been singing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_A7Hu0uKNw

I dont want to come across as a meanie towards you or anyone Nathan but Its the general cycle on this forum...mention anything to do with homosexuality at all, and out come all the patrons who tut, shake their heads, and generally just get angry.

That to me is a nigh on militant response...somehow...this thread has nothing really to do with child abuse...and lots, as always to do with squash the homos....its like a nasty bandwagon that invades, at the heart of it, its always the morality of gays... say the word "gay" and its like poking a stick into a wasps nest...out they all come, buzzing and spluttering, and all aggreeing on how terrible the situation is blah, blah, blah. posting their emoticons, waving their sticks. Waging their fingers and shaking their heads

Mike had it right. He wanted to know more about the context before screaming condemnation and burrying every single visitor to this thread in hot coals
exactly what i was thinking.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-15-2011, 11:48 PM
NateR's Avatar
NateR NateR is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyburn View Post
its always the morality of gays...
Homosexuality is immorality. There is no such thing as a moral homosexual. That's like claiming that an adulterer or a prostitute is moral.

It's not hatred of homosexuals that is inspiring this anger. It's the homosexual agenda being rammed down our throats to the point where children are being treated like lab rats in a giant social experiment, instead of being treated like human beings.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-16-2011, 01:15 AM
Play The Man's Avatar
Play The Man Play The Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,259
Default

Tyburn, this might seem like a strange set of questions, and totally out of left field, but please answer.

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/07/biidbiid/

Quote:
One day, after years of agony, an Australian man took a large quantity of dry ice and intentionally damaged his left leg, so that a surgeon would have to amputate it.

The action was intentional and the man, Robert Vickers, described the feeling of waking up in the hospital without his leg as “absolute ecstasy.” He’s one of a small number of people who have what psychiatrists have come to call body integrity identity disorder in which patients report the desire to have one or more of their limbs amputated because the extremities don’t feel like they “belong” to their bodies.
Do you think Robert Vickers should be allowed to be a foster parent to children?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/bl...reportingonthe

Quote:
"Every forensic scientists should have at least one out of the ordinary memorable case," wrote Berka Bruewer in her abstract. For her it was Edward Bodkin, a cutter who had performed numerous castrations on willing men in his kitchen. His flatmate eventually turned him in to the police (if you share a flat with someone who is even slightly annoying you at the moment, just be grateful they're not a backstreet castrator).

When police searched Bodkin's home they found nine jars containing human testicles as well as video tapes of the castrations taking place, which he was selling through a publication called Ball Club Quarterly. He was convicted of practising medicine without a licence.

Videoing the act and keeping "souvenirs" is apparently very common. The cutters often have a farm background which got them interested in castrating animals.

In the human realm there is a whole language to describe the options. "Nullos" are people who have had their genitals removed and "smoothies" have been relieved of their genitals and nipples.
Do you think a "nullo" or "smoothy" who joined Bodkins's Ball Club Quarterly should be allowed to take in a foster child?
__________________
"Be of good comfort, Master Ridley, and play the man! We shall this day light such a candle, by God's grace, in England, as I trust shall never be put out."
--Hugh Latimer, October 16, 1555
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-16-2011, 02:07 AM
Bonnie Bonnie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Where the bluebonnets bloom
Posts: 6,529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyburn View Post
there is plenty of militancy in here I see...reading this thread...I started singing... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPsL2WVhFCc
militancy
1. the state or condition of being combative or disposed to fight.
2. the active championing of a cause or belief. — militant, n., adj

It's interesting that you used that word because I think militancy can be ascribed to today's gay movement, as well, don't you? From what I've seen, they preach "tolerance" but turn around and show very little of it to anyone who doesn't believe living gay is right or just another lifestyle. If you're not with them, you are a homophobe, hateful, stupid, ignorant, an idiot...

What would happen if people wanted to have an annual Not-Gay Pride Parade? That's a rhetorical ? by the way.

You and Mike are right, we don't know everything involved with this case, but the fact the boy was taken away from them, plus the judge's comments makes me think this couple's actions weren't innocent fun. And we know his older sister was removed for some reason from the home before this happened. Am I guilty of making assumptions without knowing all the facts, yes. But, my eyebrows still would have gone up if this had been a heterosexual couple/parents dressing their little boy up as a girl and putting his picture up on a social network site. I think there is a difference between little kids playing around (Mike's story) and something like this where grown parents are dressing little boys up in girl's clothes. JM2Cs
__________________

Last edited by Bonnie; 09-16-2011 at 04:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.