Go Back   Matt-Hughes.com Official Forums > General Discussions > Politics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-28-2011, 02:35 AM
DonnaMaria
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by County Mike View Post
Lesbians are so gay.

and ugly lesbians are useless.
oh.....my....gosh......

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-28-2011, 11:22 AM
Tyburn's Avatar
Tyburn Tyburn is offline
Angry @ Injustice!
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: England
Posts: 16,838
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neezar View Post
It amazes me how hypocritical this gay couple is being. They are upset about being offended when they were purposely wearing a shirt designed to offend others.
But I thought they wanted to get married...? why would a gay couple wanting to get married wear a T-shirt saying marriage is gay
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-28-2011, 11:48 AM
County Mike
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyburn View Post
But I thought they wanted to get married...? why would a gay couple wanting to get married wear a T-shirt saying marriage is gay
They're implying that marriage SHOULD be gay - in that gays should be allowed to marry. Bit of a twist on the words I think.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-28-2011, 01:02 PM
adamt adamt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,511
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by County Mike View Post
They're implying that marriage SHOULD be gay - in that gays should be allowed to marry. Bit of a twist on the words I think.
Tyburn is still right. Dollywood should maintain, that it had them turn the shirt inside out because it appears as though they were using the word gay as a synonym for stupid, and that offends gays. They hate it that they are the new retarded. Speaking of which, what if the shirt said, marriage is retarded?

And why would the sodomites be upset that we defend marriage? Aren't they wanting to be married, shouldn't they be happy we are defending it and shouldn't they help us defend it? Dollywood didn't do anything against sodomy, only for marriage.

And yes I call it sodomy, not being gay, or being homo. I am not a homophobe, if anything i am a sodomophobe. But I ain't scared of sodomites, they seem pretty wimpy to me. I could even take em.

Also, why do we even acknowledge "gay marriage", that is an oxymoron, with the emphasis on moron. Marriage is a Divine institution, created and ordained by God, between one man and one woman. They can't change that with a law or popular opinion. The government didn't invent marriage, they don't get to dictate the parameters of it. Uncle Sam needs to brush up on his separation of church and state he likes to talk so much about. They don't want churchs talking about homosexuality, but the way I see it is that they are the ones who can't talk about it. Marriage is religious not legal rite.

If i decided matt hughes changed his name to buffy hughes the gracie slayer, does that mean he did? no, it doesn't. Likewise if all mankind decided that marriage was going to be redefined, is it? No. That is still up to God, the inventor and honorer of marriage.

Last time I checked I couldn't take a coffee maker cord and a toaster cord and tape the ends together and call them plugged in, and i know they definitely aren't going to work that way.


well anyways, that's my rant.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-28-2011, 01:08 PM
adamt adamt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,511
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NateR View Post
Dollywood is a theme park started by country music singer Dolly Parton.

Anyways, I would full expect to be asked to turn my T-shirt inside out at Dollywood if I were wearing an "Abortion is murder!" shirt. So, the only reason for me to wear such a shirt would be to spark a reaction and then cry about how my freedom of speech is being violated. These women's motives are no different. Only the media actually pays attention to them because the media is working overtime to sell the gay agenda.
I agree, but if your shirt said "abortion is gay" it would be more ironic.

It makes me wonder what the next abomination that will be thrusted on us will be. Are we going to be forced to accept pedophiles next? beastiality? necrohilia? rape?

Can murderers finally gain acceptance because they can't help it because they were born that way. And it is their right to choose?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-28-2011, 04:29 PM
Tyburn's Avatar
Tyburn Tyburn is offline
Angry @ Injustice!
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: England
Posts: 16,838
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adamt View Post
Tyburn is still right. Dollywood should maintain, that it had them turn the shirt inside out because it appears as though they were using the word gay as a synonym for stupid, and that offends gays. .
Yeah...thats what I would think if I saw it. In England its the buzz word for stupid.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-28-2011, 04:30 PM
VCURamFan's Avatar
VCURamFan VCURamFan is offline
Allons-y
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Basketball Capital of the World
Posts: 14,292
Send a message via AIM to VCURamFan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adamt View Post
Tyburn is still right. Dollywood should maintain, that it had them turn the shirt inside out because it appears as though they were using the word gay as a synonym for stupid, and that offends gays. They hate it that they are the new retarded. Speaking of which, what if the shirt said, marriage is retarded?

And why would the sodomites be upset that we defend marriage? Aren't they wanting to be married, shouldn't they be happy we are defending it and shouldn't they help us defend it? Dollywood didn't do anything against sodomy, only for marriage.

And yes I call it sodomy, not being gay, or being homo. I am not a homophobe, if anything i am a sodomophobe. But I ain't scared of sodomites, they seem pretty wimpy to me. I could even take em.

Also, why do we even acknowledge "gay marriage", that is an oxymoron, with the emphasis on moron. Marriage is a Divine institution, created and ordained by God, between one man and one woman. They can't change that with a law or popular opinion. The government didn't invent marriage, they don't get to dictate the parameters of it. Uncle Sam needs to brush up on his separation of church and state he likes to talk so much about. They don't want churchs talking about homosexuality, but the way I see it is that they are the ones who can't talk about it. Marriage is religious not legal rite.

If i decided matt hughes changed his name to buffy hughes the gracie slayer, does that mean he did? no, it doesn't. Likewise if all mankind decided that marriage was going to be redefined, is it? No. That is still up to God, the inventor and honorer of marriage.

Last time I checked I couldn't take a coffee maker cord and a toaster cord and tape the ends together and call them plugged in, and i know they definitely aren't going to work that way.


well anyways, that's my rant.


Also, I agree with your post. Plus juan
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-28-2011, 06:53 PM
Buzzard
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adamt View Post

It makes me wonder what the next abomination that will be thrusted on us will be. Are we going to be forced to accept pedophiles next? beastiality? necrohilia? rape?
Please don't take this as an attack on you, but that is just so asinine.

Two consenting gay adults are different than any of your examples. If you can't see why then this discussion is over.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-28-2011, 07:08 PM
NateR's Avatar
NateR NateR is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buzzard View Post
Please don't take this as an attack on you, but that is just so asinine.

Two consenting gay adults are different than any of your examples. If you can't see why then this discussion is over.
Not really, immorality is immorality it doesn't matter what form it takes. Plus, human morals degrade in a predictable pattern. It usually starts with the lifting of taboos on fornication (all forms of consenting sex outside of marriage) and voyeurism (lust, pornography), then the stigma of divorce is the next to go, followed by acceptance of homosexuality. Once homosexuality is accepted, the floodgates are opened and society begins to fall apart as all forms of sexual deviance become acceptable.

There are already groups out there using the exact same rhetoric as the Gay Rights movement to argue in favor of things like pedophilia, polygamy and bestiality. So, we might be having this exact same conversation in 20 years in regard to child molesters.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-28-2011, 07:54 PM
Tyburn's Avatar
Tyburn Tyburn is offline
Angry @ Injustice!
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: England
Posts: 16,838
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NateR View Post
Not really, immorality is immorality it doesn't matter what form it takes. Plus, human morals degrade in a predictable pattern. It usually starts with the lifting of taboos on fornication (all forms of consenting sex outside of marriage) and voyeurism (lust, pornography), then the stigma of divorce is the next to go, followed by acceptance of homosexuality. Once homosexuality is accepted, the floodgates are opened and society begins to fall apart as all forms of sexual deviance become acceptable.

There are already groups out there using the exact same rhetoric as the Gay Rights movement to argue in favor of things like pedophilia, polygamy and bestiality. So, we might be having this exact same conversation in 20 years in regard to child molesters.
I cant see Necrophilia ever being accepted...but ironically NOT because of the implied sexual motive.

The Zeitgeist of the time changes, its true...and its changed for the last five hundred years towards the more liberal...that is not to say it wont revert...think about how society has changed...500 years ago there was no Church without Rome, Women did not have the Vote, Blacks were slaves, Devource was unthinkable, Homosexuality was illegal...and necrophilia, peadophilia and beastiality were...simply not heard of.

Living to the age of 50 was a winner.

Now A large proportion of Christendom says Rome is no Church at all, Women can vote and work, Devorce is more commonplace then Long Term Relationships when applied to Marriage, Blacks are no longer thought of as sub human or eternally in bondage, infact the Slave trade has vanished all togther in that aspect (though not it would seem in the selling of young Hatian Lads who are orphans from the disastor...and the tabloids tell me they are rather cheap considering the current financial crisis...) Homosexuals can do what they like...and people living to 100 has led to problems that noone could have forsaw when designing the financial world...pensions...diseases...etc
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.