Originally Posted by logrus
I think my whole point is there are just as bad if not worse fighters whos loses are to less notable guys.
Mac is a prime example, his only 1 win came from a guy whos UFC record is 1-4-0. Really not someone who I would keep around when compared to Jardines..
I understand your point completely, and I personally am indifferent on the release of Jardine. On one hand I think he is good guy and a decent fighter who has fought some tough opponents and had some good showings, on the other hand I understand why the UFC has to keep it's roster fresh, and why they will ultimately only put up with so many losses, even from the best fighters.
Also, in fairness, Mac Danzig would have been cut after his last fight if the stoppage wasn't so utterly ridiculous that the whole world knew it. It's like now they have to give him another chance out of pity. Mac was also a winner of the Ultimate Fighter show and they owe it to their brand name and good business sense to give an extra push to the guys on the show that Spike TV is paying to put out there, even if that means keeping some guys around a little longer than they probably should. Does that mean I think Mac should be there and Keith shouldn't? No, not all, but I can understand the reasoning behind it.