Lesbian Couple Humiliate Foster Son

[Play The Man]

A six-year-old boy was dressed in girl's clothes by his lesbian foster parents and the humiliating photo was posted on Facebook, court documents have revealed.
One of the Australian women was preparing for a sex change to become a man - while her girlfriend was having fertility treatment, according to a Sydney newspaper.
The boy, given the pseudonym Campbell by the New South Wales Children's Court, has since been taken away from the couple and the Facebook picture removed.
When she learned of the boy who had been dressed in girl's clothes, former Children's Court magistrate Barbara Holborow declared: 'Oh my God - what are we doing?'
She told Sydney's Daily Telegraph that she had called for a full inquiry into the decision to place the boy with the lesbian women.
The case has caused outrage among same-sex women who said it gave the impression that lesbians were bad parents.
But Families Minister Pru Goward has demanded a full explanation from child welfare service Barnardos, which had arranged for the two women to become foster parents for the boy and his older sister.
'I am seeking advice from Barnardos to confirm that care arrangements were appropriate and the well-being of the children was paramount', she said.
The paper said the boy's story, described as one of the saddest in New South Wales, was revealed in a Supreme Court judgement posted in a document called Childlren's Law News.
The boy's birth mother had tried but failed in the Supreme Court to win back custody of her son.
But it has been learned that the new foster parents who now have him in their care have said they want to adopt him.
Campbell was 18 months old in 2006 when he was taken into care with his four stepbrothers and two stepsisters after complaints of physical and mental abuse by their parents.
In 2009 Campbell and his sister 'Abby' aged 12, were placed with the lesbian couple.
Because things did not work out for Abby she was moved from the couple and it was later that Campbell was dressed in girl's clothing and his photo posted on Facebook..
As the controversy grew in Australia yesterday, one supporter of the lesbian couple said the insinuation appeared to be that simply placing the children with a lesbian couple was the problem and that the foster care agency should have known that any woman crazy enough to be a lesbian was likely to 'humiliate' a child.
In a separate recent controversial case in Australia a man who became a donor father so a lesbian couple could have a child had his name removed from the youngster's birth certificate following the women's break-up.
A judge agreed to remove the father's name from the little girl's birth certificate after the birth mother's former partner asked a court to replace his name with her own.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz1Xml0UkjI

[flo]

There's so much wrong with this story. The poor little boy.

The case has caused outrage among same-sex women who said it gave the impression that lesbians were bad parents.

-----

As the controversy grew in Australia yesterday, one supporter of the lesbian couple said the insinuation appeared to be that simply placing the children with a lesbian couple was the problem and that the foster care agency should have known that any woman crazy enough to be a lesbian was likely to 'humiliate' a child.

That last "supporter" is reading a whole lot into the decision to remove the boy. Look, let's be real honest. We won't know what kind of parents gays and lesbians will be in the long run until several decades have passed. I would guess that those stats might reflect a similar percentage of "bad gay parents" for their group as there are with traditional parents. But maybe not, who knows?

This "couple" seems like they tried their best to feminize this poor child. I'm glad he was removed from their custody, I hope that is a permanent decision. And why were the siblings separated?? That was another terrible decision by the court, I wonder why the girl's time with these people "didn't work out"?

In a separate recent controversial case in Australia a man who became a donor father so a lesbian couple could have a child had his name removed from the youngster's birth certificate following the women's break-up.
A judge agreed to remove the father's name from the little girl's birth certificate after the birth mother's former partner asked a court to replace his name with her own.

WTH? How caring of him! That just seems bizarre and creepy, don't these eejits realize these are HUMAN LIVES they are messing with in their little cultural experiment?

[NateR]

I heard it said years ago and it rings true more and more every time I read a story like this: homosexuals don't want equal rights - they already have that - they want the right to violate other people's rights.

Is there any explanation as to why the boy was forced to dress up like a girl? Was it punishment of some kind? I believe both of the lesbian "parents" need to be charged criminally and serve some prison time. At the very least, neither of them should EVER be entrusted with the custody of a child for as long as they remain lesbians.

[Bonnie]

I'm sure lesbian and gay rights groups are going to try and make this all about themselves and their rights instead of what it should be about which is the welfare and protection of this poor child.

As to that other case, the biological father's name should have remained on that birth certificate! I agree with you, Cathy, there seems to be little to no consideration being given to these innocent children's lives and how all of this is going to affect them and their identity as they grow up.

What a mess!

[flo]

Originally Posted by NateR

At the very least, neither of them should EVER be entrusted with the custody of a child for as long as they remain lesbians.

Or let's just narrow that down to no kids ever.

Originally Posted by Bonnie

I'm sure lesbian and gay rights groups are going to try and make this all about themselves and their rights instead of what it should be about which is the welfare and protection of this poor child.

Yes, the child will probably be the last consideration...unless, of course, he can be used politically somehow.

[Bonnie]

Originally Posted by flo

Or let's just narrow that down to no kids ever.



Yes, the child will probably be the last consideration...unless, of course, he can be used politically somehow.

It seems like the people who should never ever have kids are always the ones who are able to have them like rabbits or they get to adopt them.

I'm sure if they think they can use this case to show they're being discriminated against, they'll do it.

I guess I'd like to know more of the story. Was he dressed as a girl as punishment? Was it a joke? Did the kid mind?

There's a picture of Kelli's nephew on Facebook dressed up as a girl. I think he's 7. His sister dressed him up, put makeup on him, etc. He went along with it because he thought it was funny. I don't think he was being abused or humiliated. He doesn't act feminine normally. He's a regular little boy.

I'd also like to know why the 12 year old girl didn't work out and was separated from her brother to live with a different family. That might give more info than the boy being dressed up.

[NateR]

Originally Posted by flo

Or let's just narrow that down to no kids ever.

If either of them were to accept Christ, abandon their lesbian lifestyle, enter into a true marriage (read: a heterosexual marriage), then gets pregnant with her husband's child, I would have trouble denying either of them the right to be a mother of her own biological child.

BTW, I've asked adamt to remove his sig image. That's just too close to pornographic for this website.

[flo]

Originally Posted by NateR

BTW, I've asked adamt to remove his sig image. That's just too close to pornographic for this website.

Not to mention the photoshop is so bad the disembodied ear alone is truly frightening.


Nate, I was being rhetorical about them not having kids. I know we as a society can't stop people who shouldn't have children from doing so (drug abusers, alcoholics, violent people, etc) because any laws like that have the probablility of being abused or applied to the wrong people.

But it seems that this couple were humiliating the boy, that's why I agree with the decision to place him in another foster home, hopefully with his sister. Some people aren't cut out to be parents; if they feel the need to have children in their lives they can certainly do so in other ways that are much needed - volunteering at Boys and Girls clubs, Big Brother/Sister programs, scouting, TAs, mentoring, tutoring, etc.

Originally Posted by NateR

If either of them were to accept Christ, abandon their lesbian lifestyle, enter into a true marriage (read: a heterosexual marriage), then gets pregnant with her husband's child, I would have trouble denying either of them the right to be a mother of her own biological child.

BTW, I've asked adamt to remove his sig image. That's just too close to pornographic for this website.

what if they were to convert to another religion .. do you still think they should have kids?? lol .. i know you don't think only Christian's should be able to procreate .. just wondering ..