Go Back   Matt-Hughes.com Official Forums > General Discussions > The Woodshed

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-28-2009, 02:38 AM
Chris F
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Speaker of the house thinks less babies is a great stimulus package.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/D...aspx?id=398956

How sick can you be. Lets have less babies and give more money to the poor so they can abort their kids and that will make the economy better. Outrage!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-28-2009, 03:01 AM
NateR's Avatar
NateR NateR is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,734
Default

Yeah, this kind of thing is sickening. So, now I guess Nancy Pulosi has decided that children are an unnecessary economic burden that must be eliminated. What a sick, morally-reprehensible human being she is.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-28-2009, 03:03 AM
Josh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris F
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/D...aspx?id=398956

How sick can you be. Lets have less babies and give more money to the poor so they can abort their kids and that will make the economy better. Outrage!
I think we would have a lot more money if we had less Nancy Pelosis around. If only there was an abortion for that. We're getting closer and closer to the government controlled family that China enjoys so much.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-28-2009, 05:30 AM
Chris F
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh
I think we would have a lot more money if we had less Nancy Pelosis around. If only there was an abortion for that. We're getting closer and closer to the government controlled family that China enjoys so much.
Sad but true. Socialism will destroy us even more. Obama wants to bail everyone out so they gov can own it all. Go check out all his plans on the white house page. His plans look more Marxist then anyhting i have seen in years.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-28-2009, 11:48 AM
County Mike
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I didn't read the article but I'm all for the poor having fewer babies.

If you can't afford to take care of them without government assistance, then don't have babies. Use birth control. I'm tired of paying for other people's babies.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-28-2009, 01:58 PM
Primadawn
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yeah well, your tax dollars are also paying for abortions. Medicaid covers it. I was FURIOUS when I discovered that.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-28-2009, 02:17 PM
billwilliams70
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by County Mike
I didn't read the article but I'm all for the poor having fewer babies.

If you can't afford to take care of them without government assistance, then don't have babies. Use birth control. I'm tired of paying for other people's babies.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Primadawn
Yeah well, your tax dollars are also paying for abortions. Medicaid covers it. I was FURIOUS when I discovered that.
I don't think what Mike was getting at is that abortions are birth control, unfortunately some people do think that way....but I'm willing to bet that's not Mike's stance....that might not have ben your take on it, but the 'Yeah well' that you started your comments with lead me to believe that you were debating his comments.

I agree with Mike though. There are very few things that bother me more than seeing a family that can't afford the children that they have. It's a touchy subject, obviously, because one can always argue the fact that these children are conceived out of love.....and that may be the case, but there's got to be common sense involved as well. It's a simple math problem, if you're having problems raising the five children that you have, don't have a sixth......it's that simple.

I didn't read the article, because I really don't care what Nancy Pelosi has to say on the issue, but I think that people with limited incomes should really consider the consequences of bringing another child into the world.

Later.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-04-2009, 12:07 AM
atomdanger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by County Mike
I didn't read the article but I'm all for the poor having fewer babies.

If you can't afford to take care of them without government assistance, then don't have babies. Use birth control. I'm tired of paying for other people's babies.
EXACTLY
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-04-2009, 12:52 AM
KENTUCKYREDBONE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If a Woman don't want kids in most cases She can keep her Skirt down! Buying contraceptives and abortions with Tax money is not likely to stimulate the Economy.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-28-2009, 09:15 PM
Tyburn's Avatar
Tyburn Tyburn is offline
Angry @ Injustice!
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: England
Posts: 16,920
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris F
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/D...aspx?id=398956

How sick can you be. Lets have less babies and give more money to the poor so they can abort their kids and that will make the economy better. Outrage!
If she is Roman Catholic, she should not be advocating abortion OR contraception...she should not be advocating sex unless FOR babies IN marriage

BTW...dont mean to point out an obvious here...but less babies = Less workers for your economy...how does that help? shouldnt she be encouraging the other way round??? She can say it has a duel role

In the future it provides an economy, and in the meantime...well have your babies, and you'll get benefits no doubt...lots of tax payers money to help your little ones...every....single........last.....one........ ..of ....them


btw, China has birth control due to lack of space...dont think America is in quite that position
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.