View Single Post
  #10  
Old 07-08-2009, 10:09 PM
Crisco
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mscomc
Forgive my need for clarity:

What do you mean exactly by that? I am not being sarcastic, I truly not 100% sure what you mean. Are you saying if you cant reason with someone you should remove them by force? for example: war, battle etc etc?

But if thats the case, there are those in the world who clearly beleive the U.S, the U.K (and other G8 countries, probably Canada as well) cant be reasoned with. So, should other countries be just as free then to attack us and remove us because in their view WE cant be reasoned with? If I totally missed your point please correct me.
This is 100% correct. If another nation fundamentally disagrees with us enough to declare please by all means do. Many of the conflicts in the world will eventually boil over and I would prefer we eliminated the threats one at a time.

NK and Iran come to mind. These countries cause NOTHING else but problems.

Muslim radicals will not stop until they are dead. I say lets kill them all before they have a chance to blow themselves up and take others with them. The world is festering around us with horrible people. It's within our ability to ease the suffering of those under their thumbs and we should do it.
Reply With Quote