Originally Posted by rockdawg21
LOL, you're funny Dave!
I'm saying that nobody on here (or anybody else that I know for that matter) seems to have any problems with NBC charging 1 million dollars per 30 seconds of advertising during the Super Bowl, so why the big fuss over the UFC charging $100,000 to be able to advertise/sponsor during UFC 100?
Two completely different things.
You're buying the most watched commercial time.
As opposed to a spot on shorts.
If the people were getting a commercial they might consider it.
The fuss is a lot of fighters will lose sponsors and money, its BS,
and its GREED at its finest.