Originally Posted by rearnakedchoke
well, my stance on this probably will not be popular ... but i don't see a problem with this .... sure abstinence is the way to go, but probably our grandparents and great grandparents were having kids at 17 ... sure they weren't promiscuous, but it wasn't out of the norm ... i mean, everything these days are sexualized and sure it needs to be changed and toned down ... but at least kids have options ... i had a kid at a fairly young age, and most people wouldn't be able to handle it ... however, this is abortion (sort-of) so if you are against it, you will be against this ...
i did used to work for the company Teva named ... LOL
The problem here is not the result so much as this is a spit in the face of parental rights. At 17 parents are supposed to be the choice maker for their kids. This tells the parent their not needing in the baby killing decision.