Originally Posted by suntereo
what do you think about a 10-8 round being contingent on "clear expression from ref that the fight is in danger of being stopped, in addition to a dominent performance."
the first round of the edgar / maynard fight is one that should have been a 10-8? (carwin / lesnar rd1 had it gone the distance?)
the third round of the penn / fitch is one that should have been a 10-9?
this would reduce the occurances of draws in the first place and then the tie breaker round could settle the more rare draws?
I guess it depends on the way each individual sees the fight because I saw Fitch winning by Unanimous decision and I clearly saw Frankie Losing the first round 10-8 and winning the remainder of the fight convincingly.