View Single Post
Old 02-10-2011, 03:40 PM
Posts: n/a

There are a hundred examples of why this article is willfully incorrect, so I’ll just pick the most obvious. The whole ‘David was gay’ argument kind of gives away the agenda of the author; pro-gay intellectuals like to go through history pointing at various figures saying ‘this guy was gay, that guy was gay’, based mostly on the evidence that they are dead and can not contradict any wild claims made about them. The fact that David ‘loved’ Jonathan does not prove sexual contact any more than does the fact that you love your parents. There are different kinds of love, and the Bible specifies sex when that is what is meant, which in this case is obviously not. The Bible details exactly how David became king, and sex was not a factor.
Reply With Quote