Matt-Hughes.com Official Forums

Matt-Hughes.com Official Forums (http://www.matt-hughes.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Woodshed (http://www.matt-hughes.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=15)
-   -   Border fence is a dividing line in immigration debate (http://www.matt-hughes.com/forums/showthread.php?t=403)

Spiritwalker 02-13-2009 11:27 PM

Border fence is a dividing line in immigration debate
 
I don't know about you guys (and gals), but building a complete fence... for the whole boarder would be a good "stimulant package". This would add jobs and insurance at least on the short term... and if it makes it harder to allow people to get across the boarder.. I say Go for it.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/...der/index.html

# Story Highlights
# Eight Democrats in Congress wrote Obama to halt building of border fence
# Border Patrol agents say fence has drastically cut number of border crossings
# Then-Sen. Obama voted to authorize almost $3 billion for building 670 miles of fence
# Critic says barrier has forced illegal immigrants to make riskier desert crossings
I say.. if they take a risk.. it's there risk to take. But some may say that it's our fault for making it difficult to get across



SAN LUIS, Arizona (CNN) -- The Yuma desert is below: San Luis, Arizona, to one side and San Luis, Mexico, to the other. On this clear day, the Colorado River is glistening, birds playfully circling over what any map defines as the U.S.-Mexico border in this area.

But from a helicopter above, the border is a steel barrier that stands out along the riverbank and against the desert sands, and is the dividing line that gets the most attention from those crying to cross illegally and those who believe recent efforts to bolster U.S. border security have been riddled with wrong choices.

Just this past week, eight Democrats in Congress wrote President Obama urging him to halt any further construction of the fence, one of the many border- and immigration-related political debates that have carried over from the Bush administration.

To the Border Patrol agents stationed in Yuma Sector, there is no debate. To them, the fence is a success story. From a Vietnam War-vintage Huey helicopter, pilot Chad Smith points across the border to Mexico's Highway 2 and then to the barriers that help stop illegal immigrants from making a sprint into southern Arizona.

"You can see the triple-layer fencing," Smith tells us as he lowers the helicopter and hovers over what was once a major crossing point for illegal immigrants and drug smugglers. "Steel fence right on the border, the pedestrian fence about 90 feet north of that, and then the chain-link fence with the barbed wire."

The fence has three layers in areas where there is an urban neighborhood on the Mexican side. Smith is among those who say their flights are less hectic now because while you can still clearly see the trails in the sand and in some hilly areas below, there is considerably less traffic.

"I've flown before and come back and had 70-plus [illegal immigrants logged in a tracking book]," Smith said. " I know guys who have gone on a flight and come back with 100-plus illegals in their logbook. Now it is in single digits, typically."

It is a fascinating view from above: Old trails in some places, and the remnants of newly placed white sandbags in others.

"It forms a pretty good bridge for them to drive across." Smith says of the sandbags. When they are spotted from above, Border Patrol agents on the ground are called in to destroy the makeshift crossings.

Congress in 2006 -- with then-Sen. Barack Obama's support -- authorized nearly $3 billion for 670 miles of fencing stretching from California to Texas. There are more lights, sensors and cameras, and there are also more agents like Mike Lowrie driving patrols and chasing tips called in from colleagues monitoring the camera feeds at the Yuma Sector headquarters.

Standing alongside the steel barrier at a point in which there is just one layer of fencing, Lowrie shakes his head when told that some in Washington want to stop additional construction in other areas.

"This used to be a very high-trafficked area, and now it is not," Lowrie told us.

Asked to define "high traffic," Lowrie says, "In the Yuma Sector, we would get about 800 a day. Now, 25 maybe, or 10."

Nodding toward the barrier, he continued: "Numbers don't lie. We didn't have it three years ago, and we were getting massive numbers of illegal entries. We have it now, and we don't."

But there are voices on both extremes of the immigration debate that say the role of the fence is exaggerated, or that say the barrier's benefit in slowing illegal traffic is offset by other costs.

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, whose tough stance against illegal immigrants has earned him global media coverage, says the fence is fine, but: "We just arrested 150 in the past 14 days. They're still coming."

And Father John Herman, a Roman Catholic priest whose Spanish language Masses are packed with illegal immigrants, blames the fence for more risky crossings in less-populated desert areas.

"We know that the way enforcement has gone has driven many people into the desert and caused more deaths. Needless deaths. If we could only get together and work for comprehensive immigration reform."

Josh 02-14-2009 12:07 AM

They should have done it years ago.

NateR 02-14-2009 12:10 AM

The only criticism I've heard of this fence is that it's not going to stop all illegal border crossings. Well of course it won't, but it will stop a big percentage of them.

I've never understood the arguments against this fence. It's as logical as locking your doors at night to keep out burglars. Of course, locking your doors is not going to stop every attempted burglary, but how dumb would it be to sleep with all the doors to your house wide open every night? That's exactly what we're doing as a nation without that border fence.

Chuck 02-14-2009 01:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NateR
The only criticism I've heard of this fence is that it's not going to stop all illegal border crossings. Well of course it won't, but it will stop a big percentage of them.

I've never understood the arguments against this fence. It's as logical as locking your doors at night to keep out burglars. Of course, locking your doors is not going to stop every attempted burglary, but how dumb would it be to sleep with all the doors to your house wide open every night? That's exactly what we're doing as a nation without that border fence.

Continuing with that analogy.....

Imagine how few would cross if we could protect our borders like we protect our household?

If you break into my house... well.... I think you know where I'm going with this :Whistle:

Spiritwalker 02-14-2009 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chuck
Continuing with that analogy.....

Imagine how few would cross if we could protect our borders like we protect our household?

If you break into my house... well.... I think you know where I'm going with this :Whistle:


Ever see the movie Doomsday.. they walled up an infected Glasgow and placed armed turrets all around... now that may be a little extreme..but maybe just for the Northern Boarder...

Spiritwalker 02-14-2009 02:00 AM

This is the part that REALLY bothers me....

Quote:

And Father John Herman, a Roman Catholic priest whose Spanish language Masses are packed with illegal immigrants, blames the fence for more risky crossings in less-populated desert areas.
The fence is not capable of making a decision. Don't blame a fence. Blame those that are trying to get into the country illegally.



"We know that the way enforcement has gone has driven many people into the desert and caused more deaths. Needless deaths.
If we could only get together and work for comprehensive immigration reform."[/QUOTE]


Why do we need immigration reform?


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.