Matt-Hughes.com Official Forums

Matt-Hughes.com Official Forums (http://www.matt-hughes.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.matt-hughes.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=23)
-   -   Obama Admin Terrorism Dictionary Calls Pro-Life Advocates Violent & Racist (http://www.matt-hughes.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1536)

rockdawg21 05-08-2009 04:13 PM

Obama Admin Terrorism Dictionary Calls Pro-Life Advocates Violent & Racist
 
Well in this case, I guess I'm proud to be "racist" :laugh:

http://www.lifenews.com/nat5019.html

Quote:

Obama Admin Terrorism Dictionary Calls Pro-Life Advocates Violent, Racist

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
May 5, 2009


Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- More details are emerging about a terrorism dictionary the administration of President Barack Obama put together in March. The newly-revealed document comes on the heels of a report the Department of Homeland Security sent out saying pro-life advocates were right-wing extremists.

http://www.lifenews.com/terrorists2.jpg

The latest report to cause national outrage is a document known as the "Domestic Extremism Lexicon," essentially a terrorism and political extremism dictionary for the Obama administration's internal use.

The March 26, 2009 document features numerous definitions and the headline "antiabortion extremism," appears on page two of the eleven-page manual.

The Obama administration calls pro-life advocates violent and claims they employ racist overtones in engaging in criminal actions.

The definition reads: "A movement of groups or individuals who are virulently antiabortion and advocate violence against providers of abortion-related services, their employees, and their facilities. Some cite various racist and anti-Semitic beliefs to justify their criminal activities."

A Washington Times report indicates the terrorism dictionary was recalled within hours after the Obama administration released it.

Amy Kudwa, Homeland Security spokeswoman, told the newspaper the dictionary "was not an authorized I&A product, and it was recalled as soon as management discovered it had been released without authorization."

Although she said the dictionary "is not, nor was it ever, in operational use," Kudwa did not appear to dispute its existence or that the Obama administration compiled it.

Kudwa says the terrorism dictionary would not have been put together following the outcry over a report sent to police and sheriffs offices nationwide saying people who oppose abortion are potential terrorists and extremists.

"Since this happened prior to our last experience, our new internal protocols were obviously not in place," she said.

Rep. Peter King, a New York Republican congressman who is the ranking member on the House Homeland Security Committee, told the Times he was furious with the news of the dictionary.

He said it "causes further concern that Congress needs to get to the bottom of exactly how DHS determines what intelligence products to distribute to law enforcement officials around the country."

In an interview following the release of the first report, DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano defended including pro-life advocates and saying "opponents of abortion" are likely to engage in extremism or terrorism.

King asked Napolitano whether the department has active investigations on "anti-abortion groups" concerning potential extremism or terrorism and the Obama cabinet official declined to answer.

She said she would not comment on the activities of the department and claimed that pro-life groups have a "history" of such actions.

Napolitano said that, although "people have different points of view about abortion" and that the Obama administration values free speech rights, some pro-life advocates cause her agency concern.

"On the other hand, at the very edge of the [abortion] debate, at the very edge are the extremist groups that have committed violent crimes," said Napolitano. "They've committed bombings and the like."

Crisco 05-08-2009 04:17 PM

There are a few pro-life orgs that do bomb and kill people in abortion clinics(which is ironic). That is who this ariticle addressed and I think the title of the article is a little twisted and is misleading.

It's understandable that these terrorists groups be recognized.

I'd like to see this book and find out what else they define perhaps people who are apart of extreme animal rights groups and such.

Miss Foxy 05-08-2009 05:08 PM

I do believe any extremist is a threat whether or not its what I believe. I am anti-abortion, however I am secure with being a non-violent opponent to abortion. I am against any bombings or other cowardly acts. I do not oppose a peaceful anti-abortion protest though.

rearnakedchoke 05-08-2009 05:27 PM

dude, read the article, it is not calling all pro-life advocates racist and terrorists .. it is calling "extremists" who use terror and racial overtones in their modus operandi ... as foxy says, those who use peaceful demonstration will not be grouped in this ... it is clear by the stuff you post, you are looking for anyway to discredit Barack ... relax, okay, you didn't vote for him .. he is still your prez ............LOL

Crisco 05-08-2009 05:58 PM

Quote:

The definition reads: "A movement of groups or individuals who are virulently antiabortion and advocate violence against providers of abortion-related services, their employees, and their facilities. Some cite various racist and anti-Semitic beliefs to justify their criminal activities."
I don't think you want to be in that group.

rockdawg21 05-08-2009 07:31 PM

Ok, I guess there's some restrictions that I overlooked when I read the definition.

However, there's nothing wrong with being violent to murderers? That's what an abortion is, murder.

IMO, it's the same as the death penalty. Like Ron White says, "In Texas, if you kill somebody, we will kill you back. That's our policy."

Crisco 05-08-2009 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rockdawg21
So, there's nothing wrong with being violent to murderers? That's what an abortion is, murder.

IMO, it's the same as the death penalty. Like Ron White says, "In Texas, if you kill somebody, we will kill you back. That's our policy."

Well you would be completely wrong. You are not an appointed authority.

You would be breaking biblical law by breaking American laws(Caesar's).

No matter how you try to justify it you would be putting your soul in jeaporady.

Don't go down that route brother nothing good to be found.

rockdawg21 05-08-2009 07:42 PM

I didn't say that I was going to act on it. I was just saying, I'm anti-murder of innocents :)

rearnakedchoke 05-08-2009 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rockdawg21
Ok, I guess there's some restrictions that I overlooked when I read the definition.

However, there's nothing wrong with being violent to murderers? That's what an abortion is, murder.

IMO, it's the same as the death penalty. Like Ron White says, "In Texas, if you kill somebody, we will kill you back. That's our policy."

WHAT? so who is okay to kill? the doctor that performs the abortion? the ultrasound tech who does the ultrasound first? the mother who gets the abortion? the admin who takes the appointment, you saying walking in and shooting all these people is justifiable homicide?

rockdawg21 05-08-2009 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rearnakedchoke
WHAT? so who is okay to kill? the doctor that performs the abortion? the ultrasound tech who does the ultrasound first? the mother who gets the abortion? the admin who takes the appointment, you saying walking in and shooting all these people is justifiable homicide?

See bold

Abortion is premeditated murder IMO.

Like I said, you guys are blowing it out of proportion like I'm going to act on it. I'm simply voicing my opinion. Sorry it's not the same as yours, get over it. :tongue0011:


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.