PDA

View Full Version : Chris F's political blog


Chris F
05-28-2011, 04:25 AM
I thought a good way to release some excess political frustration would be via a blog like I did 5 years ago. I hope this will curb some of my rants on forums like these. I hope you all will check it out and follow if it interest you. I know most of you cannot stand my POV but if you do I hope you keep up. I plan weekly at the moment. It will be a commentary on the weeks news with a historical, christian view. Here it is check it out if you can. Thanks

http://southronpartisan.blogspot.com/

KENTUCKYREDBONE
05-28-2011, 06:02 AM
I actually like with your free speech blog!

Chris F
05-28-2011, 07:30 AM
I actually like with your free speech blog!

Thank you sir and thanks to there other couple of you who have stopped by and checked it out. It says I have had several hit from this site and I appreciate them very much.

Chris F
05-29-2011, 07:49 PM
http://southronpartisan.blogspot.com/2011/05/ufc-130.html

here is my newest post. It is my 2 cents on UFC 130

Tyburn
05-29-2011, 11:07 PM
I thought a good way to release some excess political frustration would be via a blog like I did 5 years ago. I hope this will curb some of my rants on forums like these. I hope you all will check it out and follow if it interest you. I know most of you cannot stand my POV but if you do I hope you keep up. I plan weekly at the moment. It will be a commentary on the weeks news with a historical, christian view. Here it is check it out if you can. Thanks

http://southronpartisan.blogspot.com/

Brilliant.

Though a video would be better...I'd love to see your expression and hear your tone of voice...and...I dont know if I even know what you look like or sound like :unsure-1:

Still...a written blog is better then no blog at all :laugh:

I will read and respond later :ninja:

Tyburn
05-29-2011, 11:43 PM
what is a "southron" do you mean "southern" :huh:

I have to tell you, that as your Nation probably checks this website for security reasons, they probably can get to your blog, and probably do take notice of what you write...the same is true for anything you do on line.

They may not be able to stop you from writing, but dont think they cant find out and dont be suprised if push comes to shove they might use it against you.

its why I rarely talk about my employment on hear, or in my weekly blog...they look. I sware down that guy at customs when I tried to enter the country in 2009 knew who I was :unsure: Well...I had been advertizing my itinery for weeks in advance, including flight times...not that I minded...just thought it was a lil bit creepy when it actually happened :laugh:

Micheal Savage is not banned from the airwaves in England...He's banned from entering the country all together. This is because whilst England tollerates other views...it DOESNT tollerate incitement to violence. He may talk all day about hating Democrats...but if he suggests the Republicans become Patriots and take up arms against them...that is a criminal offense in England. Though unless he asked British people to take up arms against the Government or Queen...I cant see why the British Government would bother...who cares if he insights Americans to kill other Americans...what does that have to do with England??? So I think Banning him is a bit harsh...unless he was talking ABOUT the UK...in which case he deserves it.

Incidently...the home Secretary who made that decision is not in that office anymore...and was disgraced later that summer in the Expenses Scandle...when it was discovered she had asked the Tax payer to pay for work based monies...that included the rental, by her husband, of pornography

:laugh: oh GOD! only in the British Government! :laugh:

Sooo...you agree with letting the Westboro Baptists protest...because to not do so would violate their rights of free speach...do you aggree with terrorist acts...because, they equally have rights to free expression of their beliefs??

Just how far ARE you willing to allow anyone to speak or act on behalf of their own opinion? Where do you draw the line...saying you hope people recognise that they arent christian...is not good enough...why should they listen to you...and not westboro? You unearthed several deep questions...but failed to answer them (I realize answering them would take many pages of blog writing...but still...if you want to tackle a subject...you need to tackle it fully...not half assed...anyone can point out whats WRONG with a system...but most people dont have a clue about making reccomendations on how to put the system right. Bringing back Consitutional Foundations...is not good enough...reducing the Federal Government is not good enough...explain WHAT foundations need to come back...and WHAT part of the Federal Government needs to go...and what bodies will replace the Feds on a State level.)

Dont just rant...you can do that here. Actually inspire Revolution with unique ideas of combatting the problems. Create your own "Tea party" :happydancing:

...and if you dont like my critique...tough...I've added you to a bookmarked page and will check back each week until the end of time :laugh:

KENTUCKYREDBONE
05-30-2011, 06:03 AM
On Westboro I think they have the right to spew thier stupidity just not around the Folks its directed at. Where I tend to draw the line is at harassment and violence! Also the other persons free speech right does not give them the right to infringe up on my free speech rights! To me harassment,slander and violence are usually not forms of free speech. Free speech I believe was meant to protect political speech.

Chris F
05-30-2011, 08:06 AM
On Westboro I think they have the right to spew thier stupidity just not around the Folks its directed at. Where I tend to draw the line is at harassment and violence! Also the other persons free speech right does not give them the right to infringe up on my free speech rights! To me harassment,slander and violence are usually not forms of free speech. Free speech I believe was meant to protect political speech.

Yeah I just got home and so far have not seen anything but I have not looked real far yet. They were here in Oklahoma a few months back and the Patriot guard ran them off and the Owasso Police department just smiled and they refused to stop them from pushing the Westboro baptist people out of town. It was great. The police got sued by the church but the court dismissed it.

Chris F
05-30-2011, 08:16 AM
what is a "southron" do you mean "southern" :huh:

I have to tell you, that as your Nation probably checks this website for security reasons, they probably can get to your blog, and probably do take notice of what you write...the same is true for anything you do on line.

They may not be able to stop you from writing, but dont think they cant find out and dont be suprised if push comes to shove they might use it against you.

its why I rarely talk about my employment on hear, or in my weekly blog...they look. I sware down that guy at customs when I tried to enter the country in 2009 knew who I was :unsure: Well...I had been advertizing my itinery for weeks in advance, including flight times...not that I minded...just thought it was a lil bit creepy when it actually happened :laugh:

Micheal Savage is not banned from the airwaves in England...He's banned from entering the country all together. This is because whilst England tollerates other views...it DOESNT tollerate incitement to violence. He may talk all day about hating Democrats...but if he suggests the Republicans become Patriots and take up arms against them...that is a criminal offense in England. Though unless he asked British people to take up arms against the Government or Queen...I cant see why the British Government would bother...who cares if he insights Americans to kill other Americans...what does that have to do with England??? So I think Banning him is a bit harsh...unless he was talking ABOUT the UK...in which case he deserves it.

Incidently...the home Secretary who made that decision is not in that office anymore...and was disgraced later that summer in the Expenses Scandle...when it was discovered she had asked the Tax payer to pay for work based monies...that included the rental, by her husband, of pornography

:laugh: oh GOD! only in the British Government! :laugh:

Sooo...you agree with letting the Westboro Baptists protest...because to not do so would violate their rights of free speach...do you aggree with terrorist acts...because, they equally have rights to free expression of their beliefs??

Just how far ARE you willing to allow anyone to speak or act on behalf of their own opinion? Where do you draw the line...saying you hope people recognise that they arent christian...is not good enough...why should they listen to you...and not westboro? You unearthed several deep questions...but failed to answer them (I realize answering them would take many pages of blog writing...but still...if you want to tackle a subject...you need to tackle it fully...not half assed...anyone can point out whats WRONG with a system...but most people dont have a clue about making reccomendations on how to put the system right. Bringing back Consitutional Foundations...is not good enough...reducing the Federal Government is not good enough...explain WHAT foundations need to come back...and WHAT part of the Federal Government needs to go...and what bodies will replace the Feds on a State level.)

Dont just rant...you can do that here. Actually inspire Revolution with unique ideas of combatting the problems. Create your own "Tea party" :happydancing:

...and if you dont like my critique...tough...I've added you to a bookmarked page and will check back each week until the end of time :laugh:

Thanks Dave. I was not aware he was banned from the country. I only read the article where his show was banned. Thanks for the info.

As for the Westboro issue. I think people have a right to express themselves even if I disagree with what they are saying. But I have the same right to return that back at them. The church is nothing more than attention whores who go around spewing their hate because they think God is somehow punishing America for its stance on Gays. God is not a puppet master and can careless what America as a Gov does. His people on the other hand should step up and act like followers. The US Constitution is not pliable to personal choices and while what they say is appalling it is their right. But rest assure they will face others who are not afraid to let them know they are not welcome in their community.

Can't wait to see what you post Dave. As for what I look like I think Mark posted a pic a year or so ago. It was an old picture from when i ran for office I think. As for what I sound like I had some sermons online at one time but I think they are long gone. LOL. When I stopped pastoring I pulled them off line. I might put some on again or on facebook. Blessings

Chris F
05-30-2011, 08:24 AM
what is a "southron" do you mean "southern" :huh:

I have to tell you, that as your Nation probably checks this website for security reasons, they probably can get to your blog, and probably do take notice of what you write...the same is true for anything you do on line.

They may not be able to stop you from writing, but dont think they cant find out and dont be suprised if push comes to shove they might use it against you.

its why I rarely talk about my employment on hear, or in my weekly blog...they look. I sware down that guy at customs when I tried to enter the country in 2009 knew who I was :unsure: Well...I had been advertizing my itinery for weeks in advance, including flight times...not that I minded...just thought it was a lil bit creepy when it actually happened :laugh:

Micheal Savage is not banned from the airwaves in England...He's banned from entering the country all together. This is because whilst England tollerates other views...it DOESNT tollerate incitement to violence. He may talk all day about hating Democrats...but if he suggests the Republicans become Patriots and take up arms against them...that is a criminal offense in England. Though unless he asked British people to take up arms against the Government or Queen...I cant see why the British Government would bother...who cares if he insights Americans to kill other Americans...what does that have to do with England??? So I think Banning him is a bit harsh...unless he was talking ABOUT the UK...in which case he deserves it.

Incidently...the home Secretary who made that decision is not in that office anymore...and was disgraced later that summer in the Expenses Scandle...when it was discovered she had asked the Tax payer to pay for work based monies...that included the rental, by her husband, of pornography

:laugh: oh GOD! only in the British Government! :laugh:

Sooo...you agree with letting the Westboro Baptists protest...because to not do so would violate their rights of free speach...do you aggree with terrorist acts...because, they equally have rights to free expression of their beliefs??

Just how far ARE you willing to allow anyone to speak or act on behalf of their own opinion? Where do you draw the line...saying you hope people recognise that they arent christian...is not good enough...why should they listen to you...and not westboro? You unearthed several deep questions...but failed to answer them (I realize answering them would take many pages of blog writing...but still...if you want to tackle a subject...you need to tackle it fully...not half assed...anyone can point out whats WRONG with a system...but most people dont have a clue about making reccomendations on how to put the system right. Bringing back Consitutional Foundations...is not good enough...reducing the Federal Government is not good enough...explain WHAT foundations need to come back...and WHAT part of the Federal Government needs to go...and what bodies will replace the Feds on a State level.)

Dont just rant...you can do that here. Actually inspire Revolution with unique ideas of combatting the problems. Create your own "Tea party" :happydancing:

...and if you dont like my critique...tough...I've added you to a bookmarked page and will check back each week until the end of time :laugh:

I forgot to tell you about Southron vs Southern. It is a culture thing. People in the South refer to it as Southron. It was done like that on purpose. Mostly deals with the people who have Scots/Irish heritage. tehre is a long story behind it but I will save that for another day. Maybe a post somewhere done the line. I have actually got liberals cursing me out saying I can't spell etc etc. They just do not relaize I am not to worried about their Yankee obsessions. Thanks again

Chris F
05-30-2011, 08:35 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcOXJAnztw&feature=share here is a video. You can see all the people including the patriot gurad chasing them (WBC) out of town. CLASSIC!!!!!!!!!! It seems most never showed up because some truckers blocked them in at a truck stop in Kansas. Now thats free speech.

Tyburn
06-02-2011, 08:31 PM
oh...okay...I was wondering about the Southron thing.

I still think you need to take more time to explore some of the areas you touch on. You still havent made it exactly clear how far you allow freedom of speech or expression to go...and we havent talked about some of the more odd things...for example, if you believe there is power in the Occalt...should you as a Christian permit the casting of spells, or curses to occure? Is Devil Worship EVER to be permitted...or are there somethings people just shouldnt have a right to touch.

its a hard subject...but I'm sure even if you dont tackle it directly, this sorta thing is going to turn up in your writtings repeatedly. I can just tell :laugh:

Chris F
06-02-2011, 11:11 PM
oh...okay...I was wondering about the Southron thing.

I still think you need to take more time to explore some of the areas you touch on. You still havent made it exactly clear how far you allow freedom of speech or expression to go...and we havent talked about some of the more odd things...for example, if you believe there is power in the Occalt...should you as a Christian permit the casting of spells, or curses to occure? Is Devil Worship EVER to be permitted...or are there somethings people just shouldnt have a right to touch.

its a hard subject...but I'm sure even if you dont tackle it directly, this sorta thing is going to turn up in your writtings repeatedly. I can just tell :laugh:

I think the GOV who make sthe laws should not ever impose one belief over the other. So Wiccan (people who practice spell casting) and Satanist have just as much right to speak on their views as I do. I as a Christian really have no auhtority to dictatr anything but I can vote for people who are like minded to direct my country in the way I feel it should go. The joys of a republic is that laws and nor popular opinions should dictate. Sadly, lobbyist now are the only ones with power.

Tyburn
06-03-2011, 12:02 AM
. I as a Christian really have no auhtority to dictatr anything

I sincerely dissagree

Listen...not all opinions are valid...we live in a world full of absolutes...and the Truth is Christ. I can promise you that when he returns, the one thing that you will find serverely restricted is "free speech" As his ambassidors, I think that there are SOME circumstances where we dont need to let them speak.

Firstly, if they are a convicted criminal.

Secondly...if they have anything to do with the occult. They are not only under the influence of the enemy, they actually have power to corrupt people.

Jesus did not let demon infested people babble. He didnt sit and listen and say "go ahead, you have free speach" No...he SILENCED Demons...infact he even told demons who recognised him as the truth, and were going to tell everyone who he was...to, in effect, witness and testify...he told them to be quiet also.

As a son of GOD I believe that we actually do have that right...and that we can employ GOD to remove their freedom of speech and freedom of expression...Being in an Alliance with Christ gives you the Authority to Act in His Name...and there is no higher authority then that.

Its called Friends in High Places....I constantly ask for help, and I constantly see results...and I know very well that I dont have the direct power...but I have a Heavenly Father to whom I can appeal...and more often then not, IF I do, and IF its a righteous request...then he will act, and...swiftly. Sometimes within moments.

Chris F
06-03-2011, 12:39 AM
I sincerely dissagree

Listen...not all opinions are valid...we live in a world full of absolutes...and the Truth is Christ. I can promise you that when he returns, the one thing that you will find serverely restricted is "free speech" As his ambassidors, I think that there are SOME circumstances where we dont need to let them speak.

Firstly, if they are a convicted criminal.

Secondly...if they have anything to do with the occult. They are not only under the influence of the enemy, they actually have power to corrupt people.

Jesus did not let demon infested people babble. He didnt sit and listen and say "go ahead, you have free speach" No...he SILENCED Demons...infact he even told demons who recognised him as the truth, and were going to tell everyone who he was...to, in effect, witness and testify...he told them to be quiet also.

As a son of GOD I believe that we actually do have that right...and that we can employ GOD to remove their freedom of speech and freedom of expression...Being in an Alliance with Christ gives you the Authority to Act in His Name...and there is no higher authority then that.

Its called Friends in High Places....I constantly ask for help, and I constantly see results...and I know very well that I dont have the direct power...but I have a Heavenly Father to whom I can appeal...and more often then not, IF I do, and IF its a righteous request...then he will act, and...swiftly. Sometimes within moments.

In my realm of influence I can do all i cna to better it. But legally our Constitution prohibits it. This is why I think the church should stay out of politics and influence the voters not the politicos.

Tyburn
06-03-2011, 12:42 AM
In my realm of influence I can do all i cna to better it. But legally our Constitution prohibits it. This is why I think the church should stay out of politics and influence the voters not the politicos.

Your constitution DOES NOT stop you from calling on GOD to defeat your enemies.

...and in any case...GOD isnt bound by The Constitution :)

Chris F
06-03-2011, 06:25 PM
Your constitution DOES NOT stop you from calling on GOD to defeat your enemies.

...and in any case...GOD isnt bound by The Constitution :)

No it does not sure enough. The bible tells me to pray for my enemies not so much asking God to defeat them. But I do pray God changes the church here in America to be a better influence on culture. Right now the idiot box is the greatest influence and it is 100% liberal horse manure. So this is why America is so messed up. I see what you are saying now Dave and I agree. I was politically speaking not so much speaking in terms of the spiritual. :)

Tyburn
06-03-2011, 08:01 PM
The bible tells me to pray for my enemies not so much asking God to defeat them.

Thats also not true if you understand the true nature of blessing and revelation.

There are two things you could do to an enemy, the first is try and defeat them yourself. You might manage it, you might not. IF you do manage it then you wont get anything good out of it in the long run. Except feeling better.

Or you can do what GOD asks you to do, which is bless them. Now I have gotta tell you that Blessing a non Christian is very dangerous to that person. Why? Because if you are a non Christian (or a mistaken Christian) and someone prays a blessing on you, what they are doing is asking GOD to reveal himself to you. GOD is perfect, people are not, and when GOD comes into contact with imperfection, the imperfection changes...and that process of change is not particularly pleasent it has to be said. In Revival, when the Churches prayed for GOD to reveal himself, the people of the towns were left clinging to lamp posts when they saw visions of Hell opening up beneith them. Ordinary people, just walking down the roads of that town.

It thus makes more sense why GOD said "Vengance is mine" Because when you pray a blessing on your enemy, you are committing him to more pain and anguish then you, yourself could ever inflict...BUT you are also opening that person up to become Saved like yourself. So...you get your justice, AND GOD wins another battle in the spiritual war.

Do you follow now, why GOD instructs what he does...and how Justice still gets served. So...you can indeed pray defeat on your enemies...simply ask GOD to bless them, and reveal his true nature to them...and believe, that one day they will wake up screaming in bed when he makes a State Visit to their bedroom :laugh:

Chris F
06-04-2011, 08:17 PM
http://southronpartisan.blogspot.com/2011/06/to-pray-or-to-pray-judges-unconstitonal.html

here is a little more on free speech