PDA

View Full Version : Osama Bin Laden, Where is he?


Robertboxerboy
12-29-2009, 07:19 PM
Where do you think he is?Its been almost 9 years and we still have yet to find him. What if, he did a nice shave, cut his hair, a couple nice finishing touches and now, he's walking around wall street? Or is he dead? Maybe in another country?

The reason I am asking this is I just got done reading a book called To Kill Bin Laden: The Battle of Tora Bohra (its a good book you really should read it)

Chris F
12-29-2009, 07:28 PM
He is renting an office in the West Wing. :)

Crisco
12-29-2009, 07:28 PM
dead

Robertboxerboy
12-29-2009, 07:32 PM
yeah my dad read the book to and somewhere a guy that was reaaly close to bin laden said he was dead and actually gave a date as to when he died. Or is he saying that so the american Delta Force, will get off his case? I still think he is alive but just hiding.

donaldbreland
12-31-2009, 08:01 AM
He is our President.

Miss Foxy
12-31-2009, 01:23 PM
Hopefully the goat/camel looking bastard is DEAD..

Bonnie
12-31-2009, 02:39 PM
He is supposed to be really tall so I think, clean-cut or not, he'd draw attention. He could/might be dead, but until they prove it, his shadow will always be out there. :wink:

I think if we had been able to get him early on after 9/11, and cut the head off the snake, things might have gone a lot differently for us over there. Then again, it might have just fueled those crazy b*****ds hatred for us that much more--if that's even possible.

Tyburn
01-02-2010, 03:54 PM
He's probably still in hiding. :ninja:

donaldbreland
01-02-2010, 06:09 PM
I'm not saying he is our President really but boy do they have some of the same characteristics.

Play The Man
01-02-2010, 06:42 PM
A terrorist "safe house" in Pakistan

Kyle Lewsader
01-02-2010, 07:00 PM
he is at the exact location of latitude: 84.976856467 Longitude:-49.89696596
:)

actually i think they had the chance to catch him but there was some obscene reason why they didnt. Im pretty positive that happened to Sadam Insane as well.

Black Mamba
01-02-2010, 08:27 PM
You are correct Kyle, the US did have a chance to capture Bin Laden. I believe during the Clinton administration we knew the where abouts of Bin Laden. We had people there to get him and yet the powers to be didn't want to do anything. We just let him get away.

Robertboxerboy
01-02-2010, 09:39 PM
I agree i think he is in a "safe house" somewhere

atomdanger
01-03-2010, 11:03 AM
Bin Laden doesn't matter,
didn't Bush tell you? We got Sadaam instead.

rearnakedchoke
01-03-2010, 05:48 PM
i think he is dead ... of natural causes

donaldbreland
01-03-2010, 07:06 PM
Bush was a better president than that thing we have in office now. Saddam killed more people than Bin Laden did. You better believe that Saddam had something to do with 9-11 as well.

donaldbreland
01-03-2010, 07:08 PM
[QUOTE]i think he is dead ... of natural causes/QUOTE]

Yeah because our Military couldn't have the intelligence to kill that crooked Muslim S.O.B. I have a question for you rearnaked. Do you practice the Muslim faith.

Jonlion
01-03-2010, 07:43 PM
Bush was a better president than that thing we have in office now. Saddam killed more people than Bin Laden did. You better believe that Saddam had something to do with 9-11 as well.

Saddam was a despot dictactor.

He would never of had dealings with Islamic terrorist groups such as Al'Quada.

He was a Totalarian, in absolute power and ruled and shared with no one.

I doubt he gave two figs about Osama's cause, only his own power

atomdanger
01-03-2010, 07:45 PM
Bush was a better president than that thing we have in office now. Saddam killed more people than Bin Laden did. You better believe that Saddam had something to do with 9-11 as well.

I was unaware the plan after 9 - 11 was to find the middle eastern man who had killed the most people.
Silly me, assuming the plan was to find the people responsible for those attacks.

Maybe we should look in Saudi Arabia, you know, where he is from.

atomdanger
01-03-2010, 07:46 PM
Saddam was a despot dictactor.

He would never of had dealings with Islamic terrorist groups such as Al'Quada.

He was a Totalarian, in absolute power and ruled and shared with no one.

I doubt he gave two figs about Osama's cause, only his own power

That is an interesting point.

Jonlion
01-03-2010, 07:52 PM
That is an interesting point.

I can't back this up completely but I know that I have heard and read a lot a bit about this.

If you look into ethnicities etc etc they dont get on.

Like Saddam and the Talliban hate eachother and so forth.

I'll tread on some dangerous ground here but iraq is a nutty place, they need ruling under tough control and the country was a lot more stable under Saddam keeping it in line. Perhaps we shoulda just beat him down and not completly knocked him out.

Tyburn
01-03-2010, 09:27 PM
Bush was a better president than that thing we have in office now. Saddam killed more people than Bin Laden did. You better believe that Saddam had something to do with 9-11 as well.

Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11 Saddam only really killed his own people (unless he was using conventional warfare, in which case I suppose you can credit him with killing a few Irainians...and those citizens of Kuwait...and maybe a few Americans during the Gulf War I guess.)

He wasnt interested in anything but himself...and FYI the Americans never put Saddam on Trial...

He was a Tyrant, noone mourns his passing...BUT dont be fooled into thinking it had anything to do with Afghanistan at all.

There are several other theories, The first is that Junior was finishing Seniors work, by tying off looose ends under the guise of Terrorism. Using International Law to proove Saddam was in violation and then breaking that same system of Laws to bring him to Justice

The Second is that Iraq had oil, and the future of your economy is based on that commodity, Conqure Iraq, and rebuild it with a Pro-American Regieme and you guarentee your countries future.

The most likely reason is neither. The most likely reason is that America judged Iraq to be on the verge of being toppled by Iran. The race for the Oil was not to secure a future for America, but to stop Iran from becoming THE powerhouse of the Middle East. They might mess with Saddam, but they wouldnt mess with America. They could use Seniors History to be efficient, they could liberate a Nation of a Tyrant, they could appease International law, and use Terrorism as an excuse. It was perfect. Until France and the UK ****ed it up...but even then, it didnt go to bad.

Now the world is rid of a Tyrant, a Nation is Liberated, and Iran will never see the oil which is safeguarded by the Americans.

But dont kid yourself into believeing that 1) Iraq had nukes capable of Bombarding the west or 2) Saddam was in league with Osama. Neither are True, give it a decade or two, and not even your Government will deny it.

Here is another thought for you. Perhaps if the US had only fought one war at a time, Osama would have been caught, and Afghanistan would be over. Instead of fighting one war properly, and then the next with a chance of winning both...you went and fought both at the same time, and have only partial success with both...and no Osama.

Mindue...at least Iran dont have the oil I suppose. Of course...all that might change when you leave Iraq :unsure-1: Supposing this hypothesis is true, it would be unwise for the US to ever leave Iraq whilst Iran is a powerful Nation.

Iraq isnt so much the enemy, as the battle ground.

rearnakedchoke
01-03-2010, 11:32 PM
[QUOTE]i think he is dead ... of natural causes/QUOTE]

Yeah because our Military couldn't have the intelligence to kill that crooked Muslim S.O.B. I have a question for you rearnaked. Do you practice the Muslim faith.

you think i am a muslim because i think bin laden died of natural causes??? i think we could have killed him, but i think he knew we were coming and gtfo...

AMJ
01-04-2010, 01:02 AM
Donald Breland posts the most outlandish comments on this forum, it simply amazes me that someone with such a limited scope of understanding can be so confident in his ignorance.

bradwright
01-04-2010, 02:12 AM
Donald Breland posts the most outlandish comments on this forum, it simply amazes me that someone with such a limited scope of understanding can be so confident in his ignorance.

:laugh::laugh::laugh:

Donald is going to be gunning for you now....try not to be to hard on him when he does....i think he is just misunderstood sometimes.:wink:

Miss Foxy
01-04-2010, 03:37 PM
:laugh:Bin Laden doesn't matter,
didn't Bush tell you? We got Sadaam instead.

Miss Foxy
01-04-2010, 03:39 PM
[QUOTE]i think he is dead ... of natural causes/QUOTE]

Yeah because our Military couldn't have the intelligence to kill that crooked Muslim S.O.B. I have a question for you rearnaked. Do you practice the Muslim faith.
WTF? Are you seriously that ignorant to ask him such a question? What are you basing your ridiculous inquiries on?